Showing posts with label best lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best lawyers. Show all posts

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Obamacare decision

> Obamacare decision raises issues of justices' impeachment
>
> The six U.S. Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold ObamaCare
> should be impeached for abandoning the rule of law, explains attorney
> Larry Klayman. Klayman stated Thursday morning: "These six Justices
> have violated their own long-established rules of interpretation for
> applying statutes to instead advance their own political objectives or
> burnish their public persona. Such personal goals corrode the role of
> the Court. The Justices abandoned the rule of law and have become
> merely a political focus group."
>
> As Justice Antonin Scalia makes clear in his dissent, the Justices
> actually rewrote the Affordable Care Act instead of interpreting it.
> Scalia wrote in dissent that the legacy of the Roberts Court will be
> "forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United
> States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it
> takes to uphold and assist its favorites." Scalia explained that the
> Court engaged in "somersaults of statutory interpretation" to save
> ObamaCare, rather than applying neutral and consistent rules to all
> laws equally.
>
> Freedom Watch has grown especially concerned about the independence of
> the Supreme Court due to reports from a whistleblower that private
> information about Chief Justice John Roberts, and other judges and
> justices, were "harvested" illegally by the U.S. Government. Although
> it is illegal for the Central Intelligence Agency to operate within the
> domestic United States, a contractor whose company was hired to perform
> the "harvesting" for the CIA has come forward to blow the whistle. He
> claims to have proof that the CIA harvested personal and private
> information about Roberts and other federal judges and may be
> intimidating or subtly threatening the U.S. Supreme Court with the fear
> of personal attacks.
>
> To preserve the Republic in its last gasps, Congress must impeach these
> Justices. The U.S. Constitution provides in Article III, Section 1,
> that "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
> their Offices during good Behavior." It does not give judges a term for
> life but only "during good Behavior."
>
> Klayman is a former federal prosecutor, head of Freedom Watch and
> previously founder of Judicial Watch.
>
> For more information, contact daj142182@gmail.com or visit
www.freedomwatchusa.org//>
>

Friday, June 26, 2015

TITLE 18 USC, SECTION 242

From the DOJ website itself.

"TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

    Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or
custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if
bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this
section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened
use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if
death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or
if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an
attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for
any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
"

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/242fin.php

Sunday, April 19, 2015

ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICES ARE VACANT

Bombshell: Rod Class gets FOURTH Administrative Ruling "Gov't Offices are Vacant"-
All Gov't Officials are "Private Contractors"
Submitted by The South on Sun, 10/14/2012 - 18:25
Yes, you read that correctly; it is true, and is now on the court record; black ink on white paper. Please read on:
A lot of us have been exposing the crime of the UNITED STATES corporation for many years, but until recently, no one has had the proof that all government offices are vacant; no one is home; those supposed government offices/agencies are being occupied by PRIVATE CONTRACTORS and are NOT being occupied by a legitimate government body.
This is equivalent to the ice cream man knocking on your door and extorting taxes from you. He has no lawful authority to do anything other than drive the ice cream truck - he's not a government official; he's an ice cream man.
Your supposed government officials are nothing more than ice cream men/women who are fraudulently extorting money from you and your family; throwing you in prison; taxing you to death; stealing your children and imposing their will on you, and enforcing their own internal-statutory rules and codes upon you and your family.
Rod Class has now received FOUR Administrative Rulings that prove what many of us have felt to be truth: What you think is government; what you think are legitimate Government Officials/Senators/Congressman/Policeman/Governors/Tax Collectors, etc. are nothing more than private contractors, extorting money from American Citizens and failing to pay off the public debt as they are instructed to do by the 1933 bankruptcy.
What they have done is this…These people have switched places with the average American Citizen. They are enforcing their own Administrative codes, that are only meant for THEM, upon regular Citizens who are not being paid by the corporation. The supposed elected officials have hoodwinked the country into an employment position without pay. They themselves are taking public money to occupy government seats/positions/agencies, when they are nothing more than private contractors ... Felony!
They are treating us as if we are paid government employees; enforcing their own internal rules-regulations-codes, and statutes on the average Citizen, as well as conveniently forgetting to send us our weekly/monthly government employment checks.
I've been preaching this for the last year and with no avail on this forum. Perhaps now, people will begin to listen and take action.
In these radio shows, Rod explains his Administrative Rulings from the various Judges, explains the con, and shows you, where in their very own U.S. Codes the above aforementioned information is spot on.
There are a few shows you need to listen to, and here are some bullet points of those shows:
1. All BAR attorneys are prohibited from representing John Q. Public; can only represent gov't officials and employees within their own agencies, their BAR Charter says so;
2. Any Judge that prohibits you from representing yourself or hiring a defense other than a BAR attorney, are in fact, committing a felony on the bench in violation of the Taft-Hartly Act (running a closed union shop) and the Smith Act (overthrow of Constitutional form of Gov't);
3. Anytime an BAR attorney represents someone in a case against you, you can now claim that person is incompetent; a ward of the state, with no standing to sue;
4. Any and all tax collectors, police officers, sheriffs dept's, DOT, tag agencies, BAR attorneys, Judges, Highway Patrol, supposed elected officials, are nothing more than private contractors, who can now be brought up on fraud charges for impersonating a public official while receiving federal funding;
5. Any and all home, vehicle, credit card loans are supposed to be discharged through the Treasury window, in compliance with the 1933 bankruptcy laws. These scumbags are double dipping and never discharging the debt like they are supposed to. They are embezzling the funds and pocketing them for themselves;
6. Every person sitting in prison today was railroading by a BAR attorney whose first allegiance is to the State; who had no lawful authority to represent them; who worked in concert with the State to perpetrate a fraud upon its victims;
7. Orders from Administrative courts prove for the fourth time, an agency of the State is NOT an agency under the State;
8. Elected Officials are claiming 11th Amendment sovereignty, when it's actually you and I that hold 11th Amendment sovereignty. They are getting paid by the corporation, you and I are not;
9. They have admitted to the crime of no one actually holding a public office; they are filling corporate seats and defrauding the public;
10. Political subdivisions are not getting their 40% funding from the Feds as they are supposed to get;
11. These Judges have admitted (black ink on white paper) that all these State Offices are ........... EMPTY;
12. Now we have Administrative paperwork - ruling these public offices aren't part of the State agencies;
13. Attorney Generals may not practice law; can't represent the people who are not public officials;
14. If the State is a 3rd party interloper in your Marriage (marriage license); Vehicle Title (State Registration), etc. then they are liable for 1/3rd of the cost to manage the daily activities of that contract;
15. If the State demands you have a Drivers License and Tag your vehicle because it is registered with the State, then as the owner of the vehicle, the State is required to pay for the vehicle, the tags, licensing, fuel, tires, oil, etc. and they are also to pay you a salary for driving a State owned vehicle; it says so in their own Highway Safety Act and USC - CFR rules and regulations;
16. We now have the court orders that goes back and nullifies any and all IRS and Tax cases, Foreclosures, Credit Card Debt, cases or actions. These people never had the lawful right to demand anything of you; they are corporate actors, not a legitimate government body;
17. Judge admits the 1933 bankruptcy, and no way to pay off anything because of Federal Reserve Notes; all public debt is to be discharged through the Treasury;
18. Only the Secretary of Transportation can hear traffic cases; all traffic cases are civil, not criminal;
19. If you're not being paid for you time, you are not required to have one of their CDL or CMV licenses; it's prohibited;
20. Says we now have a major labor dispute on our hands; US corporation running a slave racket against American Citizens without the pay;
21. United States Codes (USC) and Titles #1 thru #50 are void; have never been passed by Congress; all have been repealed;
As I've been saying for a very long time on this forum: If you are not getting a weekly or monthly paycheck from the so called federal government aka UNITED STATES or one of its sub corporations such as the STATE OF ***, then their statutory rules (not laws), codes and regulations DO NOT APPLY TO YOU ......... Period!
There is so much information packed into these last six calls, I can't even begin to share it in this post. If you want your freedom; if you want to know with 100% surety that the foreign corporation known as the UNITED STATES has zero authority over you unless you are receiving a weekly paycheck from them, take the time to listen to call #646 through #651here: http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=4...
Scroll down the page and click on the orange "Listen" button; a pop up player will appear for your listening pleasure.
And believe me: This is pure listening pleasure, with the court filings, rulings, and US Code to back it all up. By the time you finish these few short shows, your fear of the government will be a thing of the past. Also, many of Rod’s current filings against the infrastructure are at: http://harveyw26.minus.com ...some may be easy to download, some may not !
And for those of you who are new to the forum and want to get a better grasp of all this prior to or after listening to the calls, here are some of my more informative posts on the matter at hand: Public Notice to Gun Grabbing Politicians: http://www.dailypaul.com/246514/public-notice-attention-to-a...
So the Government wants you to collect a sales tax? http://www.dailypaul.com/245362/have-a-business-and-the-govt...
Your Home Loan was paid the day you signed the note: http://www.dailypaul.com/244590/want-to-stick-it-to-the-bank...
What's the One Document in your possession that gives you the authority to rule over my life? http://www.dailypaul.com/244165/whats-the-one-document-you-h...
Can the State be an actual injured party? ..... No, it cannot! http://www.dailypaul.com/243521/can-the-state-be-an-injured-...
Having a Social Security # is not a contract with the State/Feds:http://www.dailypaul.com/243164/social-security-is-not-a-con...
Trust Law, your Rights and how to enforce them:http://www.dailypaul.com/243090/trust-law-your-rights-and-ho...
Hopefully now in light of these Administrative Court Rulings people will now come to realize the fact, that Unless You Are Getting A Weekly Check From Government, Their Statutory Rules-Codes-Regulations They Put Off As Laws, Have Zero Force Or Effect On You Personally
No Contract = No Jurisdiction: Did you fill out an employment contract with the State? Are they paying you for your services? If not, why the hell are you following their rules?
This is how we change our current form of Government back to the Republic is was initially intended to be. If you don't take the time to listen to at least those last six shows at the link above, you are overlooking the most important information ever to come to light within the Liberty Movement. Stop looking for a savior to save us from tyranny and listen to the shows I've provided. Now you are your own savior - Individually, now you can make a HUGE difference in our political structure and form of government. In Liberty!



Thursday, April 16, 2015

HOW TO SIGN AGREEMENTS WITH YOUR LAWYER...

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
I hope that everyone realizes that UNCONDITIONAL signature creates an NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT. Now it wouldn't if we still were under common law, but under the current Law Merchant, UCC, an unconditional signature makes you subject to IMPLIIED liability. As UCC-3-104 says:
§ 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT.
"(a) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d), "negotiable instrument" means an unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest or other charges described in the promise or order,..."
“Without Prejudice” UCC 1-207 (308) means “that which is so clearly stated or distinctly set forth that there is no doubt as to its meaning.” Negotiable Instrument Law UCC 3-104.2 states that a summons, license, or draft ‘must’ be signed “unconditionally.”
A reservation of Without Prejudice places a condition on the agreement which means ‘I do not partake’, the unit is now non-assumpsit. These units are “unconscionable” at UCC 2-302.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
"Law phrase. Without abandonment of claim, right, privilege and without implied admission of liability."
http://thelawdictionary.org/without-prejudice/
So by adding "Without prejudice" before your signature, you're asserting your right NOT to be liable for anything that WAS NOT disclosed to you at the time of signing. I.e. that makes your signature CONDITIONAL, meaning that when they say you're liable to do this, or are subject to this statute, you can say "I reserved my rights NOT to agree to anything that was not disclosed, and at the time of signing you DID NOT say that signing makes me subject to your statute(s)".
Of course they can refuse your application if you sign that way. And guess what, THAT is a PROOF that rights reservation protects your rights! And in regard to any past forms that you signed unconditionally, you can AMEND those, by sending them a note that you're amending your application form(s) by adding the words "without prejudice" before your signature.
They might ignore that, but that should reserve your rights. They also might revoke the benefit that you applied for, since you no longer are liable to obey the rules that come with that benefit. So ULTIMATELY we have to start using lawful money such as US coins and pay with other things of value, because if they revoke our gov't benefits, we need to assert our rights under EQUITY, and you can't do that if you "pay" for everything with green paper.
BTW, these rules apply to negotiable instruments:
When there are disputes as to the terms of an instrument, the following rules govern
1. Handwriting prevails over typewriting and print
2. Typewriting prevails over print
3. Words prevail over numbers
4. Can be postdated, antedated, or undated
Here's an excellent book about using "without prejudice":
http://www.amazon.com/Without-Prejudice-UCC-1-207-Sovereign/dp/1414017359/ref=sr_1_2
And the attached doc below is also a great explanation of asserting your rights. I just don't agree with the author about the meaning of the phrase USA, as that was the very name of our Constitutional Republic, first used in the Declaration of Independence. He's also delusional with his rant against oaths, claiming that's some religious ceremony. It's not, oaths are BONDS and they are properly used. For example under common law, complaints are bonded by swearing under penalty of perjury. So if the guy lies, then he'll be facing criminal charges. If the swearing was not required then anyone could MAKE UP lies about you, and so make you waste time and money defending against his lies.
Here's a part of that doc:
"Let's go back to the Article I Legislative and Article II Executive Branches to discover the mischief of legalized piracy and conspiracy upon the innocent People of the land.  
This is how it works: We initiate the 'engraft' Interlocking Directorates by agency fiat of 'unconscionable' contract, license, and enrollments. The signing at UCC 3-104.1, which if "unconditional", at UCC 3-104.2 gives agency police power to access your property by executing negotiable "dishonored" instruments of "promise" per UCC 3-104.3. This applies to all “persons”, such as, all commercial entities, corporations, governments, and every other “thing” that legally falls into the description of “person”, but not the Freeborn People.
All "IMPLIED POWERS" are "vested" by the Negotiable Instrument Law and enforced by the Uniform Commercial Code at 3-104 (1) Signing, and (2) Unconditional, and (3) Promise.
Negotiable Instruments of the categories of W-2 forms, Marriage Licenses, Driver License, Dog License, Social Security License (#123-45-6789), etc., etc., presumed to be voluntary, knowingly, willingly and intentionally signed by the Citizen, initiate the "implied powers" of the Article I Legislative Branch to be "engrafted" upon Article II Executive to collect the tax with "implied" police power, but offers no delict to destroy diversity of Citizenship. The dolus bogus "contract" initiating Article II Executive police power, together with Article I Legislative "statutes" as the other "implied" power creates third party instruments "presumed" to obligate the parties signed upon any such "contracts"."
 EXHIBIT_020_-_NOTICE_Penumbra_Doctrine_Does_NOT_Apply.doc
BTW, as this is all about negotiable instruments under the UCC, then even if we don't reserve our rights, we can assert our UCC rights, i.e. demand that they 1) identify themselves (by name and DOB of the person/agency), and 2) produce proof of their authority, and of their Holder in Due Course status.

I.e. every time that an agent of some muni corporation demands payment or performance, it might be considered a PRESENTMENT under UCC 3-501.