BIGGEST SCAM OF ALL TIME COURT HOUSES ARE BOND TRADING HOUSES

COURT HOUSES ARE MONEY TRADING COMPANIES
JUDGES INVEST THEIR PENSIONS IN CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA

When recorded send to:

Henry: Frederick of the Kroll family

513 Peninsula Avenue

Kenai, Alaska [99611-9998]

                                    SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY

===========================================================================

   NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT AND

                                                         BILL IN EQUITY

Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a society (STATE) is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the State of Alaska does business as a corporation with an IRS EIN number 92-6001185 and the transactions are not always in the best interest of the people, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the State of Alaska sells the people’s resources for billions of dollars and the transactions are not always in the best interest of the people for a common goal, and,

Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Alaska is a representative one, and,

Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,

Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,

Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding those who have a Social Security Number are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one & rsquo;s Social Security Number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding people in Alaska have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,

Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,

Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that when your parents sign up for it, you get a Birth Certificate, which gives you certain RIGHTS to gov't benefits. And that's in return for you depositing your SOVEREIGNTY with the federal gov't. You see, American people are sovereign, and as such they're not liable for the national debt or income taxes, and the gov't needs someone to back up their fiat 'money' scheme and spending, without them being responsible for it so they have created this criminal scheme, and,

Whereas I, Henry-Frederick of the Kroll family was born a free man and child of God on a vessel floating on navigable waters near the town of Seldovia before Alaska was a state, and,

My mother, the Public Health Nurse, signed my certificate of live birth as the attending physician, and,

Whereas sometime after statehood the State of Alaska illegally absorbed my STANDARD CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH and crossed out the original Register Number 21701 and put a blue boarder around it with a state seal and a state bond number 121462, and,

Whereas the STATE OF ALASKA CORPORATION monetized me without my consent or knowledge and sold my fraudulent birth bond to investors, and,

Whereas I, Henry-Frederick of the Kroll family claim to be a Freeman-on-the-Land and not a corporate bonded slave sold into bondage by criminals, and,

Whereas "When your parents signed the birth certificate, they created a legal fiction called a straw man.  In commercial law it’s called a (homus straus?), which is a legal fiction or straw man. First the State registered it with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept. of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC (Depository Trust Company). This company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and settlement company. The DTC is nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE and company. That’s the nominee, and,

Whereas all your money goes through this company (DTC). This is the clearing corporation, clearing house and settlement depository for all commodities and securities. All commodities and securities are registered with CEDE and Co. under rule 12. Everybody is reading the UCC.  You should be reading SEC. Alpine publishing in NYC they have the national securities and exchange act of 1934.  There are two of them one in 1933, and one in 1934 - two different acts.  You should be studying these rules because what they're doing under rule 12 they are register your birth certificate. – Under rule 12 as a security.  They register this in the name of CEDE and Co. There are two types of securities Certificated and un-certificated.  What they do is issue a certificate. Isn’t that what it says on your birth (certificate of live birth)? When they register it they issue a certificate, it becomes a certificated security. And it’s registered in the name of CEDE and Co.   What does that make them?  It makes them the registered holder. This has nothing to do with debtor/creditor law.

Whereas you own everything and you don’t control anything.  They control everything why? Because they are the registered owner– of the certificated security (birth certificate) and they use this as collateral. You have to know what is going on before you go in there a start filing these UCC’s.

Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards and claiming my rights as a free man does not breach the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,

Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,

Whereas without security interest, the State has NO RIGHTS/authority against you, because it has no equitable title to your property, as you're in the PRIVATE, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that it is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to license, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that all jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court.” Pipe Line v. Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22.Whereas it is my understanding that “People of a state are entitled to all rights, which formerly belong to the King by his prerogative.” Lansing v Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9,20 (NY).

Whereas it is my understanding that "The state can only tax and regulate something it creates". Ward v. Maryland 12 Wallace 418, and it did not create me, and,
Whereas “The people are sovereign and not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,…..It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound.” People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825). and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the King ceded his sovereignty to the American people, so they became sovereigns without subjects, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that "The right of expatriation is a natural, inherent, and inalienable right and extends to the Indian as well as to the white race. "United States, ex rel. Standing Bear, v. George Crook. 25 F.Cas. 695 (1879), and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,

Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,

Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,

Whereas the STATE OF ALASKA is a corporation operating under the DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION taxpayer’s identification number: 92-6001185, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the court: SUPERIOR COURT ‘FOR’ THE STATE OF ALASKA is a contract court working ‘FOR’ the STATE OF ALASKA under the Department of Administration, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that Alaska court houses are bond trading companies contracted to take money from the birth bonds of ‘PERSONS’ by the use of ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTS created by printing the PERSON’S name in all capital letters to enrich the State Treasury, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that judges invest their pension funds into Corrections Corporation of America, and,

Whereas it is my understanding the reason my case number 3AN-04-9O8O-CI was allowed to continue more than eleven years was for the purpose of taking millions of dollars from my birth bond number: 1214625 that was put upon my birth certificate by state bureaucrats without my consent or knowledge sometime after statehood, and,

Whereas the State of Alaska allowed the dumping of radioactive drill tailing from 200 oil wells between 1060 and the year 2000, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that departments within the State of Alaska allowed two oil tankers a day for more than twenty years to dump billions of gallons of tanker ballast water taken from Los Angeles, Anacortes, Hawaii, Korea, and Japanese boat harbors into Cook Inlet and Kodiak waters, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the ballast water contained trillions of foreign bacteria, algae and nematodes not native to Alaska that altered the plankton blooms making it impossible for the shrimp and crab to survive thereby taking over a billion dollars a year away from the private sector, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that there were eight oil well blowouts in Cook Inlet, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that offshore drilling rigs have pipes that eject toxic pollutants deep under water where the sheen doesn’t show on the surface, and,

Whereas commercial crab fishermen like myself  lost a billion dollars’ worth of boats and gear after the crab and shrimp resource were destroyed, and,

Whereas after the crab and shrimp resources were destroyed many small town processing plants went bankrupt and thousands of cannery workers lost their jobs, and,

Whereas the cities of Homer, Kodiak, Old Harbor and other towns lost their infrastructure and had to depend more on state and federal grants to provide services to their people, and, 

Whereas it is my understanding that DNR allow this to happen to eliminate the inshore fishing fleet so that they could sell billions of dollars of oil leases in lower Cook Inlet down Shelikoff Strait, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that as it turned out there is little or no oil in the area, and,    

Whereas it is my understanding that all processes in the cited CASE NO: 3KN-11-00695CI, have been summary processed in which the Constitutional and commercial right to jury trial has been abridged and denied and all other supporting processes have likewise been summary processed, and,

Whereas I was informed by the alleged judge of the alleged court that I could appeal if I did not like his decision, and given that I am age 71 the alleged judge has a sadistic sense of humor, and,

Whereas I read the conclusion of twenty of the recent Supreme Court cases and not one of them reversed the decision of the Superior Court, and,

Whereas my chances of prevailing in on appeal are less than 5%, the reason being that the Court Clerk would have to return the money taken from the bounds and given to the state, and,

Whereas it is my understating that this entire case constitutes multiple fraud violations including the failure to acknowledge the July 26^th 2014 BLM survey as proof that there is no case, and,

Whereas is it my understanding that the BAR association is a foreign corporation based in England, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that ‘BAR’ stands for British Accredited Registry, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that all officers of the court sworn to uphold BAR rules and are acting as foreign agents on American soil, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that BAR members are foreign agents committing TREASON on American soil and the penalty for treason is death, and,

Whereas thousands of counts of fraud have been perpetrated against the people of Alaska depriving them of life, liberty and property worth many billions of dollars, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that administrative rulings by fraudulent contract courts are totally lacking in validity and jurisdiction having no effect whatever on sovereign citizens, and

Whereas common law is still in effect in America and USE of Federal Reserve Notes to make purchases, CREATES tax liability, while the SSN officially makes you a taxpayer and provides the gov't with an easy mechanism for collecting that tax. Which is why a DEMAND for lawful money is a MAJOR step out of the corporate Matrix, and,

Whereas it is my understanding the United States of America,{the land of the free}has more people in jail that Russia and China combined, and,

Whereas a Harvard-UC Berkley study found that the chance of a child escaping the poorest of Americans and land among its richest had increased only 0.6 percent in 15 years while Denmark has twice the chance of an American to escape poverty, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the property that I inhabited for 70 years and used it before Alaska was a state and that I have the right of use and access free of charge and,

Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not

affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation and summons issued by defacto contract courts working for the corporate government create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,

Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,

Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,

Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land in a de-facto contract court, and,

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities ’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right, and,

Furthermore, I claim the right to deed my property to others as I see fit, and,

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure and not a contract court working for the State of Alaska, and,

Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Alaska are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both

parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act, and,

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise

regulated and FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.  

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Reponses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service. Whereas if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time it shall remain in force forever, and,

Whereas I hereby present a bill: §1205. Bill in equity by injured person to the State of Alaska.

"1. Injunctive relief; damages and costs.  Any person damaged or who is threatened with loss or injury by reason of a violation or threatened violation of this chapter may bring a civil action in the Superior Court in the county where he resides, to prevent, restrain or enjoin such violation or threatened violation. If in such action a violation or threatened violation of this chapter shall be established, the court may enjoin and restrain or otherwise prohibit such violation or threatened violation. In such action it shall not be necessary that actual damages to the plaintiff be alleged or proved. In addition to such injunctive relief, the plaintiff in said action shall be entitled to recover from the defendant 3 times the amount of actual damages by him sustained and the costs of the action including reasonable attorneys' fees."

Whereas  2. Equity SUPERSEDES codes if you have a valid claim. So if you pay with green paper you are NOT entitled to Equity. However when I bought the Kroll homestead land from Del and Nancy Alsop, I paid them 40-one-ounce gold krugerrands when gold was worth $990 and ounce.  I mentioned this fact earlier in my un-rebutted affidavits.” I paid Dell Alsop REAL gold and I AM entitled to make a claim in Equity.  And,

Whereas I also make a PROPERTY CLAIM.  CLAIM: A claim is a challenge of the ownership of a thing which a man has not in possession, and is wrongfully withheld by another. Plowd. 359; Wee i Dall.444; 12 S. & R. 179.  __ 1856 Bouvier's Law Dictionary. Whereas  until 1933 we had REAL gold and silver money and REAL common law, which was divided into AT LAW (criminal) and EQUITY (civil) jurisdictions. But since in 1933 the United States went bankrupt, took all the people’s gold and replaced real money with green paper, people no longer have REAL ownership, and all property ownership is presumed to be in the State, because you CAN'T acquire FULL ownership rights, when you pay for things with PAPER notes.

Whereas the ownership of property is split into the EQUITABLE title which belongs to the State, and the LEGAL title which YOU get. And the equitable title gives the State the right to REGULATE 'your' property, while the legal title gives you the right to POSSESS and USE that property, subject to State regulation, and,

Whereas if we still had REAL gold money in circulation, people would get a FULL, LAWFUL title to their property, which would NOT be subject to State regulation, except when used in commerce, like for example using a boat or auto for BUSINESS purposes, and,

Whereas after 1933 people no longer had FULL property rights, the At Law and Equity jurisdictions were replaced by a STATUTORY jurisdiction, since in absence of real money and lawful titles, everyone's subject to State codes and statutes. In other words, ONLY people with FULL property rights are entitled to make a CLAIM under Equity, while everyone else is subject to codes and statutes. However since we the people are forced to us the fiat paper currency we can claim Equity, and,

Whereas the people of this nation were turned into bonded slaves to back the fiat currency by the bond numbers put on their birth certificates at birth, and,

Whereas when people are killed during a military conflict the generals and the press refer to them as collateral damage, and,

Whereas what is SPECIAL about Equity, is that it SUPERSEDES codes and statutes.  If you pay with REAL gold or silver or with your labor then you WOULD be entitled to make a claim in Equity, and,

Whereas Equity is for anyone who was damaged, is threatened to be damaged, or has a CLAIM which means that it also could be used as a COUNTER-CLAIM, against anyone trying to restrict use of your property (which you bought with lawful money) such as a car, or when that car was impounded. In this case we use the land and items taken in COMMERCE!

Whereas the only duty of any Government is to secure and protect property. Please restore my property. “Truth Has No Agenda!”

Whereas the land is question is shown as tideland on all State and Federal plats, and,

Whereas Ninilchik Natives Association can’t claim tideland. In fact they had to lease tideland from the State of Alaska DNR 3/4 of a mile west of the sand spit to construct a temporary dock to export wood chips, and,

Whereas the present owners of the homestead cannot claim the sand spit because it is tideland lying outside the boundaries of United States Survey 4684.

Whereas I have many decades of sweat equity building cabins and the boats we use in our set-net fishery. I have sweat equity in constructing our 3,600 square foot home plus the hanging and mending our fish nets, boats and gear.

Whereas I am a sovereign “ON” the land USING IT IN COMMERCE with a valid claim to it before Alaska was a state.

The cited Lien Debtors will be lined for a minimum of $22,857,000.00 each, based on Title 18, Section 241, of the United States Code for violation of United States Constitutional Rights including the Seventh Amendment of the Bill of Rights, guaranteeing a jury trial in all commercial processes and approximately 35 other commercial provisions of the United States Constitution.

             - BILL IN EQUITY –

Pertaining to the Public Fraud, Law, Money and Commercial Liens:

To Whom These Presents Shall Come; Greetings; Take Notice: I HEREBY DEMAND COMPENSATION FOR THE FOLLOWING LOSSES INCURRED DUE TO CORRPUTION FRAUD AND MISMANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC RESOURCES AND THE LOSSES INCURRED DUE TO THE FRIVOLOUUS LAWSUIT: NO. 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL. Claimants are allowed to claim four times their actual losses.

1.      My Attorney costs for this frivolous lawsuit: $ 135,980.

2.      The destruction of the crab fishery with tanker ballast water: $2,000,000.

3.      My brother’s life: No amount of money can repay me for that.

4.      My Daughter’s life: No amount of money can repay me for that.

5.      The cost of my bankruptcy due to the destruction of the crab fisheries: $900,000.

6.      Loss of my 72-foot boat, Mary M after the state allowed the destruction of the shrimp and crab fisheries: today’s boat prices: $1,950,000.

7.      Loss of 200 crab pots: $ 150,000.

8.      Loss of our home, warehouse and deep water mooring in Halibut Cove $600,000.

9.      Loss of Tuxedni Bay homestead after I paid off the State mortgage $1,000,000.

10.  Loss of the herring fishery due to oil spills. $2,000,000.

11.  Loss of my process ship Orion: $6,950,000 after a state company stole my business plan.

12.  Loss of the halibut fishery given away to the Federal Corporation by Governor, Tony Knowles for political gain: $1,000,000.

13.  Loss of the shrimp & clams due to tanker ballast & oil well blowouts: $100,000.  

14.  Health related problems due to divorce, suffering, worry and stress: $334,020.

15.  Loss due declining value and forced sale of our Seldovia property. $150,000. (EXHIBIT 13 B.)

16.  Lost fishing time for having to appear in court: $20,000.

17.  Our skiffs and outboards are worth $30,000.

18.  Twelve nets are worth a total of $10,600.00 with anchors buoys and lines.

19.  I paid $10,000 for my Polaris six wheeler in Tuxedni Bay.

20.  The 20 by 20-foot cabin on the Home point $20,000.

21.  10 by 12-foot cabin 100 yards west of home $8,000.

22.  8 by 8-foot cabin on the end of the sand spit $4,000.

23.  8 by 8-foot sauna cabin $4,000.

24.  8 BY 8-foot heavy timber, cellar with cement foundation $4,000. 

25.  8 by 8-foot generator shed $2,000.

26.  Machine shop tools including my 16-inch swing metal lathe plus all the accessory tools, welder, planer, table saw etc. $20,000.

27.  Loss of my 13 by 24-foot upstairs apartment $ 8,000.

28.  Our annual salmon catch of $50,000.00 for the next ten years $500,000.

29.  The loss of our future subsistence hunting and fishing rights. $500,000.

30.  Lost time, stress and aggravation over the last eleven years $110,000.

31.  The money taken out of HENRY KROLL CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL during the last eleven years. $4,000,000.

       

Total owed AFFIANT: $22,857,000.00 jointly and severally. Please be advised that the lien claimant of a non-judicial commercial lien is entitled to three times the actual loss. A commercial lien will be recorded and UCC1 within 20 days.

Whereas it is mandated in The Constitution of the State of Alaska SECTION 18. EMINENT DOMAIN: Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation. If the SUPERIOR COURT cannot abide with the Alaska Constitution in Case No. 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL then it is not a COURT.

Whereas the lawsuit was a violation of our families’ First Amendment Animist religious beliefs. As a Native Alaskans born in Alaska we have to work with nature and become a part of it to survive. Destroying our means to earn a living, taking our fishing gear, private property and forcing us to live in poverty without just compensation is genocide.

Whereas Defendants were made to suffer numerous TORTS forcing us to attending unlawful administrative hearings, use credit cards to pay lawyers and other TORTS described in my 15 un-rebutted AFFIDAVITS filed with this court in alleged CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL to defend our subsistence hunting and fishing rights, our right to earn a living and our way of life. The only duty of any government is to secure and protect property, and,

Whereas Officers of the Court dis not uphold their oaths they are in Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Please restore my property.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land.

Place of claim of right to use: sand spit / tideland south of US 4685 north shore Tuxedni Bay, Alaska North American Union ~ One World Order.

Furthermore I claim the right to file and enforce a COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST those parties

who stole property from me and my family under color of law using CONSTUCTIVE TRUST administrative rulings in a contract court. Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, _______________________________________ a Freeman-on the- Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .

Constructive Notice of Child of God Status:

Whereas Alaska is a territory claimed and founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and,

Whereas the number two position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and,

Whereas the governments of this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and,

Whereas I am desirous of living my life as a 'Child of God,' and,

Whereas the only powers able to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and,

Whereas neither the government, nor its agents nor its representatives or employees are God, or above God, and,

Whereas by legally claiming the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,

Be it known to any and all, that on this date,

_________________________________I,________________________________________a free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'.

Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God. Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful. Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and /or extortion.

Defendants were made to suffer TORTS forcing us to attending unlawful administrative hearings, use credit cards to pay lawyers and other TORTS described in my 15 un-rebutted AFFIDAVITS filed with this court in alleged CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL to defend our subsistence hunting and fishing rights, our right to earn a living and our way of life. The only duty of any government is to secure and protect property. If Officers of the Court don’t uphold their oaths they are in Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Please restore my property.

I, Henry-Frederick: Kroll, hereby verify that this AFFIDAVIT NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT  is true and correct, according to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God. A real court of LAW must proceed under Oath of Office and in truth.

Notice to Principal is Notice to agent and Notice to agent is Notice to Principal.

Dated this____day of FEBRUARY 2015

Respectfully signed:                                                                                                           Sui Juris 

By authorized representative, HENRY KROLL 

                                    Without prejudice, UCC 1-207 & UCC 1-308

                                                     Jurat

Subscribed and sworn to at____________, before me this___day of February, 2015

Notary Public_____________________________

My Commission Expires____________________

My hand and official seal_____________________

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I, Henry Kroll do hereby swear and declare that I have served by the United States Mail, a copy of this NOTICE OF UUDERSTANDING  INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT BILL IN EQUITY by US mail to the respondents listed below.

Dated February____, 2015                                                              

By authorized representative, Henry-Frederick for HENRY KROLL      

                                              

Alaska Superior Court               Andrew R. Naylor                       

825 West 4^th Avenue                 1031 W. 4^th Ave, Ste. 200            

Anchorage, Alaska 99501          Anchorage, Alaska 99501         

BRIAN DUFFY Ninilchik Native Association Inc.                      Calvin Jones

1029 W. 3^rd Ave., Ste. 510                                                         PO Box 241921

Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 258-9053                            Anchorage, Alaska 99524

            Marla Greenstein                                               Jeremy Provencio and Caroline Kroll

            510 L Street, Suite 585                                       PO Box 222211

            Anchorage, Alaska 99501                                  Anchorage, Alaska 99501

            Adam Smith                                                      Senator Don Young

State of Alaska DNR                                        Governor Bill Walker

550 W. 5^th Ave., Suite 900 C                              Mark Begich

Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3577                          Senator Dan Sullivan

State of Alaska Department of Administration

P.O. Box 110204

Juneau, Alaska 99811-0204

VALUE OF DOLLAR and HUMAN BONDAGE

Credit                                                                                    EXHIBIT A

I. Background and framework.
The government founded by the original Constitution, 1787, is no longer operational. Instead, what is called the “Government of the United States” is a bankrupt, private corporation, owned, underwritten, and functioning in commerce as a front for the international bankers and the Powers-That-Be with which said bankers are allied. The entire institution, i.e., “US Inc.,” is private (not free) enterprise administering the ongoing business and political ends of the actual owners. In this current scenario, every action of US Inc. is a commercial transaction by and between fictitious entities all transpiring for the purpose of furthering the economic and political objectives of the alleged creditors.

This situation arose from the borrowing by USA from European central banks and owing the unpaid indebtedness to the Crown from the original joint-venture agreement between the Colonies (which are corporations of the Crown) and the Crown per se. It appears as though USA has been bankrupt from inception, i.e., from 1788, and the Constitution was drafted to “re-constitute” the unpaid debt and structure an organization for functioning in bankruptcy.

The Civil War was staged and financed by the bankers and the Crown to conquer the nation by engaging in the timeless strategy of “divide and conquer.” Pitting North against South resulted in the dissolution of the de jure Federal government of the organic Constitution. The States were drawn into the Central Government, as were—progressively—the people directly, with the whole conglomerate operating through the new Federal Government in the Emergency War Powers of 12 Stat. 319, 1861, under the “law of necessity.”

Thus, the “Government” functions under mere “color (appearance only) of government” with the President as acting dictator on behalf of the bankers under the President’s capacity as Commander in Chief of the Military. I.e., when the seven (7) Southern States walked out of Congress on March 27, 1861, Congress—and, indeed, the entire de jure Government of USA under the original Constitution—dissolved based on absence of a Congressional quorum to adjourn and re-convene. The result is that the actual winner of the Civil War was neither the North nor the South, but the bankers who owned the new Federal Government that defeated both North and South and absorbed and subserved the States into itself.

In accordance, inter alia, with the Limited Liability Act of 1851, the Emergency War Powers, 12 Stat. 319, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the constitutional provision allowing Congress authority to pass any law Congress wishes within the ten-mile square territory of Washington, DC, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed ratified in 1868. Within that framework, on February 21st, 1871, Congress passed the District of Columbia Organic Act, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, 16 Stat. 419, “An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” which act was revised in 1874 and reorganized June 8, 1878, 20 Stat. 102, Chap 180, 45th Congress, 2nd Session, “An Act providing a permanent form of government for the District of Columbia.” This “government” is a private corporation now known and copyrighted by such names as “The United States Government,” “United States,” “U.S.,” “U.S.A.,” etc., all referenced herein as “US Inc.”

It is important to understand that US Inc. is not a country, but a corporation—and indeed a bankrupt corporation operating under color of government as the front and device for administering the conquest in law and commerce of the United States of America. The 14th Amendment and US Inc. are all private international law in the admiralty-maritime/Law Merchant of Roman Civil Law.

The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” This amendment allows US Inc. to have complete jurisdiction over “citizens,” i.e., corporate subsets of US Inc., which the de jure federal government did not and could not possess. The 14th Amendment also states (section 4): “The validity of the public debt of the United States authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion [per 12 Stat. 319], shall not be questioned.”

The 14th Amendment established the framework for complete conquest and absorption of the country, rendering the people permanent debtors, indentured servants in involuntary servitude, peonage, and also enemies of the government as a result, in accordance with 12 State 319, any aspect of US Inc. may summarily confiscate property in rem without necessity for judicial process whenever any citizen asserts a challenge to the laws of the United States, i.e., US Inc.

Remnants of the de jure Government remained after the 14th Amendment, however, based on such things as the continuing circulation of gold and silver coin (the money of sovereigns) and the fact that Senators were still elected to the Senate by Electors of the States rather than by direct, popular vote. Senators became elected by direct vote of the people with the passage of the 17th Amendment. The Civil War had forced each sovereign State to pledge its assets as collateral and become surety and a cosigner for the defaulted Federal Government’s debt to the bankers. This procedure was repeated in the 1933 bankruptcy, at which time gold and silver coin (substance) were outlawed as money for citizens of the United States (fictions). Inability to use gold and silver as money solidified the bankruptcy of US Inc. and foreclosed every such citizen from accessing real money for use in payment of debts, thereby denying access to sovereignty. US Inc. is completely devoid of rights, substance, standing in law, and sovereign character, as is every citizen of the United States.

II. The creation and nature of the strawman.
Because additional pledging of assets was required to enable the now-bankrupt corporation to continue to operate when civilly dead, the governors of all the States met to discuss the “emergency” declared by Franklin D. Roosevelt, i.e., the bankruptcy, and how to reorganize US Inc. to continue functioning when bankrupt by means of insurance underwriting by the creditors.

The governors of the States made a “pledge” to US Inc. to underwrite the bankruptcy through a grand scheme of limited-liability insurance. The people, through their “Certificates of Live Birth,” a/k/a “newborn identification,” were registered in the office of the county recorder by “registered agents” of the government such as the “registered doctor” and “registered nurse,” and were thereby established as property of the State. Remember “register” derives from “regis,” meaning “king,” whereby everything “registered” is there to record and keep track of the king’s property.

The newborn identification is identified with, and attaches to, the flesh-and-blood being by taking a drop of blood and the print (usually footprint) of the baby and applying them to the newborn identification. Once that certificate is registered, it is recorded as a “certificate of title,” as it were, to the real being. Since the point is to be able to enslave the child and render him a surety for the debt of the bankrupt US Inc., it makes no difference who or what the baby is. Everyone becomes classified as “fungible[1] goods,” like interchangeable bales of cotton.

The parents did not understand what was happening, so the process was thereby fraud based on deceit and non-disclosure. Obviously, with full disclosure of the terms and conditions involved in the alleged contract, no one would agree to go along with it. The agents of the government perpetrate a fraudulent transfer by registering the name, blood, and footprint of beings that is birthed by the living woman and not the corporate state (which can generate only more legal fictions, not real beings). This process amounts to theft of the real being by filing a piece of paper. The State did not create the name from which the all-caps strawman was derived, only colored the name into a form they could use. The name in upper- and lower-case letters pertains to the real being, while the all-caps strawman is a legal fiction used as credit against which to borrow at the expense of the life-force of the living being to which the name and registered newborn identification allegedly relates.

When the Governors of the States, at the Conference of Governors of March 6, 1933, pledged as State-registered assets the newborn identifications of those born in the State to the federal bankruptcy, the people’s energy was established as the collateral for backing the whole operation—the entire national debt. Since the States, being fictitious, commercial entities with no capacity to recognize real beings, could not pledge private, living people or their property, a “bridge” was needed between the living people and the bankruptcy of the federal US Inc. To accomplish this result the strawman was created by the Department of Commerce in Washington, DC, to function as a shill to operate out front publicly in place of the people. The scheme had to be so clever that the people would agree to operate as surety for the debts, charges, and obligations of the strawman without knowing what was happening to them, who did it, what they were agreeing to, or how the whole process worked.

The birth certificate with the all-caps name created by the U.S. Department of Commerce is a certificate of equity interest, akin to a “pink slip”[2] pertaining to a vehicle, and possibly a bill of lading, a document of bailment, which ships the cargo (new and original birth certificate) into the special maritime jurisdiction of the creditors to operate as collateral to back the bankruptcy reorganization of US Inc. via the Governor’s pledge. The all-caps strawman is thereby “birthed”—like a vessel—into the private, international-law special maritime jurisdiction of the bankers, et al, as a “citizen of the United States born [birthed] or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

By this scheme the living people assumed the roll of guarantor, accommodation party, and surety for the legal fiction that functions for the benefit and enrichment of the creditors. In this scenario it is the strawman, not the living being, that operates throughout the entirety of today’s law and commerce. One need only look at the Social Security Card, School Records, Passports, Driver’s Licenses, credit cards, utility bills, etc., all of which are always in all-capital letters—just as are gravestones of dead people all over the world and the parties to a dispute on the caption of a court brief—to see the ubiquitous use of the strawman in today’s commercial and legal world.

A “surety” is defined as “the one who is responsible to pay.” The real man is the surety and liable by contract to pay for the debts and obligations of the strawman, even though the real man is not, nor does he own, nor does he receive title to, anything purchased or accomplished by use of the strawman. The strawman is owned by US Inc. and the banks that purchased bonds issued by the Treasury against the strawman (as credit).

As stated, US Inc. is bankrupt, and has been since 1933. US Inc. has no gold or silver to pay any debts and is civilly dead. Having neither possession, nor right of possession, nor legal capacity to use gold and silver, i.e., “lawful money,” the only asset left to finance the continued operation of the bankrupt US Inc., i.e., the “government,” was the people, who were hypothecated as the credit/collateral to finance the bankruptcy US Inc. uses the substance and labor of the people to finance its entire operation. reorganization and insurance underwriting.

The scenario is extremely sophisticated, resulting in the operation of a vast and pervasive administration of legalized peonage, slavery, permanent indentured servitude, and collectivism (communism) wherein the people have forfeited all standing in law and are “dead to rights.” The Powers-That-Be borrow against your life, rights, and labor to finance their administration of the system they use to exploit, plunder, and dominate you, all under the pretext/presumption that they are acting as your agents to fulfill your own requests. In this scheme one is punished when one fails to pay or obey.

The sequence of steps involved in creating the existing system, in accordance with the best research to date (resulting from the efforts of many devoted people), is as follows in the United States:

1. A living, flesh-and-blood baby is born from its mother’s womb.

2. The legal/commercial system, existing and functioning entirely in the abstract realm of words, contracts, legal persons, corporate entities, laws, symbols, ideas, commerce, private international law, etc., (which constitutes the “matrix”) cannot see, recognize, or deal directly with the real world, including real people. The system itself is imaginary, while the real world is genuine and substantive. Consequently, the system deals only with documents and matters in the abstract realm that form, by presumption, ratified implied contract attached to the real world by “operation of law” and the tacit consent of the people.

3. Just after birth, the involved doctors and hospitals have the mother sign a “birth certificate,” i.e., a “certificate of live birth,” without telling the mother (and undoubtedly without themselves knowing the truth) that by so doing she and the doctor are criminally informing on her newborn baby as an enemy of the state in accordance with the War Powers and turning the baby over to the bankers as chattel property and slave, pledging the baby’s life-energy and labor in perpetuity as the collateral for borrowing into existence all “currency” (debt-paper) that passes as “money” today.[3]

4. The original birth certificate, a “Certificate of Live Birth,” constitutes, as it were, a “certificate of title” to the real being, and is in essence the equivalent of a “manufacturer’s statement (or certificate) of origin,” i.e., “MSO” or “MCO,” which is created upon manufacturing an automobile and constitutes title to the vehicle.

5. Just as in the case of a car, anything being “registered” in the legal system is established on the record as property of the king. The key here is "registered," a word deriving from “regis,” meaning “king,” whereby everything “registered” is recorded as the king’s property.

6. The sequence of steps concerning the birth certificate appears to be as follows:
a. After registration of the Certificate of Live Birth in the office of the county recorder, the county recorder makes a certified, true copy or microfilm, retains it, and sends the original to the Department of Commerce in the State.
b. As in the case of the county recorder, the State Department of Commerce makes a certified, true copy or microfilm, retains it, and sends the original to the Department of Commerce of the Federal Government in Washington, DC.
c. The Department of Commerce in Washington then makes a certified, true copy and, in addition, creates a new document, constituting a “certificate of equity interest,” which is labeled “Birth Certificate.” This birth certificate, however, has the child’s name in all-capital letters, unlike the original birth certificate filed in the county recorder on which the name was in upper- and lower-case letters.
d. The Department of Commerce in Washington, DC then forwards the originals of both documents to the record repository in such locations as The Hague, for holding on behalf of the international banks, e.g., the “World Bank,” the “Bank of International Settlement,” IMF, et al. There the documents remain on deposit as the collateral/asset for hypothecating into existence the credit that finances the underwriting of the world’s bankrupt governments.

7. By this means, the people become the "utility" for the "transmission" of energy from reality into the fictitious, colorable realm of international commerce.


The private, international law that governs the legal/commercial system today is the Uniform Commercial Code, which is established as the law of the land in the United States in Public Laws 88-243 and 88-244. The UCC is private, not public, law, and is copyrighted by Unidroit, an Italian corporation out of the Vatican.
Now the people, via their all-caps names, are classified as “human resources,” and "goods" under the Uniform Commercial Code—see Section 2-105(1) and 9-105(1) in which animals, i.e. humans and their unborn offspring, become "goods" saleable in commerce.

The Department of Treasury issues bonds on the birth certificates, which are sold through securities exchanges and purchased—by extending credit on the bank’s books—by the Federal Reserve Bank, which uses the bonds as “reserves” for creating credit in the fractional reserve system. The people’s labor becomes the collateral for issuing Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC §411). The bonds are held in trust for the purchaser, now the “secured party” and holder in due course, at the Resolution Trust Company at 55 Water Street, in New York City, about two blocks down the street from the Federal Reserve. It is a high-rise office building with a sign that reads, "The Tower of Power."

After the New Deal the all-caps name, hereinafter “strawman,” is what the system deals with, since it cannot interface directly with real beings. The real being, however, is presumed to have ratified the deal, agreed to the pledge, by the three (3) means for signifying ratification of implied contracts[4].

Thereafter, the system functions on the basis of possessing complete authority to do anything it wishes with the strawman, which is the system’s own creation and property and does not belong to the living being to whom the strawman purportedly pertains.

This scheme of legal/commercial peonage and slavery is outside the Constitution, which does not apply in any matters concerning the resulting process. The system functions in the realm of private contract, private international law, in international commerce, i.e., the private international law of the private, colorable Law Merchant, not within the direct purview of the Constitution, which merely sanctifies the operational right to contract.

Thereafter, every time the real being signs his name on any legal/commercial document, he is creating more debt-currency into existence, signing as the “surety,” or “accommodation party” per the Uniform commercial Code §3-415. He is also placing title to whatever property is involved in the hands of the bond-holder.
In this scenario, the "name," i.e., strawman, is credit and is a constructive trust (trust created by operation of law, i.e., fiat) holding all the real assets, i.e., “sweat-equity,” created by the labor of the real being. The right to the use has been separated from the title. The "strawman" holds the title and belongs to the bond-holder, not the real being. The flesh-and-blood man or women has only naked possession with a limited "right" to use the thing, such as one’s body, possessions, or land. Such illusion of ownership and right is essential to maintain the sting on an ongoing basis, keep the people from completely rebelling if their status as slaves was self-evident, and fostering more enthusiasm to work and produce by thinking that they are doing so for their own benefit rather than for the enrichment and power of their owners/masters/rulers.

When the strawman violates some rule or statute, such as is presumed whenever the strawman receives a traffic ticket, the flesh-and-blood being must appear at an arraignment and admit that he is the surety and accommodation party for the strawman, and thereby agree to provide the "energy" necessary for providing whatever fine or penalty is deemed due and payable. The real being has re-confirmed the contract of implied unification of the real being with the strawman by saying “here” when the strawman’s name is called in the idem sonans, i.e., “same-sound,” tribunal.[5] This is why it essential for the operation of the system that people "voluntarily give" their names to the court. The “Defendant” in the action is the strawman, not the real being. The real being confirms that he is, or may legally be treated the same as, the Defendant. Through this process one has entered through a door over which is inscribed: “Abandon hope all ye who enter here.”
It is now clear that the strawman is:

1. A “nom de guerre,” meaning “a name of war,” whereby the strawman is regarded as being in a state of “insurrection or rebellion” per Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, 12 Stat. 319, and the Trading With The Enemy Act;
2. A “stramineus homo,” or “strawman,” the legal and commercial consequences/aspects of which are that it is a permanent debtor in legal incapacity, a dead estate;
3. An artificial entity owned by the secured party who bought into the bond placed on the market by the U.S. Treasury.

It is important to remember that the strawman is not the property of the real being. The living man or woman is merely the surety (sucker) providing the labor, life-energy, and sweat-equity for the fiction owned by US Inc. and the bond-holder. The strawman is the front that enables the secured party to act in legal/commercial dealings without revealing his identity, and to deceive the real being, who signs in all matters as a surety and accommodation party, into thinking that the real being is doing something for himself rather than his owners/masters. Everything the real being signs on behalf of the strawman places title to whatever property is involved into the hands of the United States and the bond owner, i.e., the secured party over the strawman.
Do we have a claim on our all-caps strawman? The short answer is, “yes,” but only after we assert that claim properly. Otherwise, the presumption remains that US Inc. and the owners of the bondholders own the strawman.

The foundation of our claim is that they did not originate the strawman, but merely altered the original name by changing the upper- and lower-case name into a “same sounding” name spelled in all capital letters without full disclosure. That all-caps name is used to finance the system of power and self-enrichment of US Inc. and its owners at the expense of the enslavement of the people. They do not possess any authority to use the name based on the unlawful object of intent to perpetrate the scheme to reduce the people to slavery and peonage by engaging in fraudulent concealment and a mountain of other crimes. In addition, it is the living being to whom the name refers that provides the labor, substance, and life-force that gives value to the strawman, and thereby authorizes the real being to claim superior title to it. Those who expropriate the output of others for their own unjust enrichment, subjugate the populace, and bring about the ruin of those from whom they steal the rights, life force, labor, and wealth, have no legitimate grounds to assert a claim of superior title, either in law, equity, or commerce.

There is a sequence of steps that must be done to become free of the bondage-system that now enslaves mankind and regain lost freedom and independence. The system has not, to say the least, been forthcoming in educating the people concerning the true legal and commercial situation to which virtually everyone in the world is now subject.[6] A mother having given birth to her baby is not informed that by allowing her child’s birth certificate to be registered she is, for instance:

1. Informing on the baby criminally and declaring her newborn infant to be an enemy of the state with no rights;

2. Consigning the child to permanent slavery, peonage, and indentured servitude;

3. Declaring her baby to be fungible goods and the chattel property of the bankers and world powers.

If full disclosure, good faith, and genuine meeting of the minds prevailed, as is required for any purported contract to be an actual, bona fide contract enforceable at law, and the people knew the truth, the banks and governments of the world would be out of business. It has been a long, dangerous, often ruinous road—involving the blood, sweat, tears, property, and even the lives of many people—to uncover the nature of the clever scheme. Such people, most of whom not only love freedom and truth but principle for its own sake, have not been willing to remain in ignorance and bondage, and have diverted their lives to the task of understanding the nature of the system and discerning ways to become free of it.
Once you have control of the name you can use it for your benefit instead of the system using the name to use you for its benefit without your knowing what is happening.

[1] Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, defines “fungibles” as: “Goods which are identical with others of the same nature, such as grain and oil.” See also UCC 1-201(17).

[2] A “pink slip” pertaining to a motor vehicle is not title, but merely evidence of title. It indicates that title exists somewhere. Actual title to the vehicle consists of the original Manufacturer’s Statement (or Certificate) of Origin, the “MSO,” which, upon purchase of a new car, is sent to the State Department of Motor Vehicles. Whoever owns the MSO owns the vehicle, whereby one who buys a new car without taking possession of the MSO gifts his new purchase to the State, which may thereafter require that anyone using its property comply with all of the requirements of use, such as possessing a valid driver license, carrying insurance, complying with all the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Code, etc. Upon receipt of the MSO, however, the Department of Motor Vehicles micro-films, files, and then destroys the MSO. Inasmuch as only the original of a document counts in commerce, once the original MSO is destroyed, no proof of actual ownership exists. The microfilm is hearsay. This provides a forum for executing a new MSO and establishing ownership of the car in another jurisdiction where one’s ownership of the substance, i.e., the actual car, is acknowledged.

[3] On its face, this is a most startling statement, which requires clarification. The original Emergency War Powers of 1861, 12 Stat. 319, not only has never been repealed, but is the foundation for subsequent acts, such as the Trading With the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, and the Amendatory Act thereto, i.e., the “Banking Relief Act,” of March 9, 1933, just after Roosevelt's Inauguration. The Amendatory Act (48 Stat. 1) amended the Trading With the Enemy Act, and was passed by Congress at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foe. The American people were (unknowingly) at war with their conquerors, the Banksters, who had defeated the country by the treachery of their something-for-nothing paper-money banking swindle and other deceits, rather than force of arms. The pen can indeed be mightier (and more suicidal for those who mindlessly use it) than the sword. This amended version of the Trading With the Enemy Act provided "legal" justification for dramatic increases in the power, scope, and authority of the U.S. Government (now owned by and an administrative agency of the bankers).

The original Trading with the Enemy Act excluded citizens of the United States from being treated as the enemy when involved in transactions wholly within the United States. The Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, however, expressly included the people of the United States as the enemy by insertion of the following text: "...by any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 1(b).
By operation of law the American people became the "enemy" of the private Federal Reserve/IMF Creditors in bankruptcy, who have thereafter been administering their prize/conquest through their alter ego and front, the "U.S. Government." To regulate and control their slaves/chattel property, they rendered (under color of law and government) all intercourse illegal amongst the American people without obtaining permission through licensing. To travel, a driver's license is required; to open a business requires a business license (not to mention additional and on-going mountains of "red tape"); to work for another one must obtain licensing through a Social Security card.

To be "within the United States" one must merely be a "person" or "resident," i.e., a 14th Amendment "citizen of the United States." Although one can never know who actually knows what, the chances are overwhelmingly large that the vast majority of doctors and hospital personnel are as ignorant of how badly they’ve been had as the rest of their fellow countrymen. Part of the cleverness of the sting is that it has been structured so that the people end up policing and being policed by each other without ever knowing whose agenda they are actually fulfilling. It is possible that Henry Ford was correct in his celebrated statement: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."

[4] The three means of ratifying an implied contract, i.e., a unilateral offer from the system to you, are: 1) Do nothing; 2) Accept benefits from the system; 3) Fail to know, declare, and properly notice the appropriate parties in the system of your applicable law.

[5] A given name sounds the same when spoken, regardless of whether the spelling on paper consists of all-capital letters (the strawman) or upper- and lower-case letters (symbolically representing the real being).

[6] The nature of the existing scenario is not, for instance, on the curriculum of any institution of public education, nor is it discussed in the media, news, law schools, etc. Obviously no con that is explained by the con man remains a con.