Saturday, June 27, 2015

Obamacare decision

> Obamacare decision raises issues of justices' impeachment
>
> The six U.S. Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold ObamaCare
> should be impeached for abandoning the rule of law, explains attorney
> Larry Klayman. Klayman stated Thursday morning: "These six Justices
> have violated their own long-established rules of interpretation for
> applying statutes to instead advance their own political objectives or
> burnish their public persona. Such personal goals corrode the role of
> the Court. The Justices abandoned the rule of law and have become
> merely a political focus group."
>
> As Justice Antonin Scalia makes clear in his dissent, the Justices
> actually rewrote the Affordable Care Act instead of interpreting it.
> Scalia wrote in dissent that the legacy of the Roberts Court will be
> "forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United
> States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it
> takes to uphold and assist its favorites." Scalia explained that the
> Court engaged in "somersaults of statutory interpretation" to save
> ObamaCare, rather than applying neutral and consistent rules to all
> laws equally.
>
> Freedom Watch has grown especially concerned about the independence of
> the Supreme Court due to reports from a whistleblower that private
> information about Chief Justice John Roberts, and other judges and
> justices, were "harvested" illegally by the U.S. Government. Although
> it is illegal for the Central Intelligence Agency to operate within the
> domestic United States, a contractor whose company was hired to perform
> the "harvesting" for the CIA has come forward to blow the whistle. He
> claims to have proof that the CIA harvested personal and private
> information about Roberts and other federal judges and may be
> intimidating or subtly threatening the U.S. Supreme Court with the fear
> of personal attacks.
>
> To preserve the Republic in its last gasps, Congress must impeach these
> Justices. The U.S. Constitution provides in Article III, Section 1,
> that "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
> their Offices during good Behavior." It does not give judges a term for
> life but only "during good Behavior."
>
> Klayman is a former federal prosecutor, head of Freedom Watch and
> previously founder of Judicial Watch.
>
> For more information, contact daj142182@gmail.com or visit
www.freedomwatchusa.org//>
>

Friday, June 26, 2015

TITLE 18 USC, SECTION 242

From the DOJ website itself.

"TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

    Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or
custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if
bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this
section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened
use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if
death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or
if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an
attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for
any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
"

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/242fin.php