The Anunnaki own the Moon and it is Nibiru
NO MOON UNTIL 12,713 YEARS AGO
Giordano
Bruno (a 16th century Italian philosopher) is reputed to have written in De Immenso: (Bk IV, x, pp. 56-57): “There are those who have believed that there
was a certain time (as our Mythologian says) when the moon, which was believed
to be younger than the sun, was not yet created. The Arcadians, who dwelt not far from the Po , are believed to have been in existence before it (the
moon).” “Theodorus writes in his first
book that the moon had appeared a little while before the war which was fought
by Hercules against the giants.
Aristochius and Dionysius Chalcidensis, in the first of their works,
confirm the same.” “Mnaseas said that
the Arcadians were born before the moon, and so they were called ‘proselenian’;
meaning, ‘before the moon’.” [1]
Bruno
goes on to step upon the sensibilities of future scholars by noting that, “the
earth, which is of the same species as the moon, is of creatable and destructible substance, and is truly
animal and even mortal, although divine.
Therefore, the planets (worlds) are able to be created and destroyed,
and it is not possible that they have been eternal, since we have proved them
to be alterable and consisting of changing parts.” [1] [emphasis
added]
Velikovsky
<http://www.varchive.org/itb/sansmoon.htm> has
discussed this same idea by noting that one of the most remote recollections of
mankind is in regard to the period of Earth’s history when it was
Moonless. Velikovsky quotes everyone
from Democritus and Anaxagoras to Aristotle and Apollonius of Rhodes to show
that such a pre-Hellenic time existed.
Those humans living at the time were called Pelasgians, Proselenes
(“before the Moon”), and Arcadians (pre-Danai and pre-Deukalion). They
were said to have dwelt in the mountains, fed on acorns, and lived as
aborigines. [See below.]
Plutarch,
Hippolytus, Censorinus, and a doubting Lucian wrote of pre-Lunar people, as did
Ovid, who said that the Arcadians possessed their land before the birth of
Jove, and were older than the Moon.
There are even Biblical references (Job 25:5 and Psalm 72:5) which
allude to a Moonless Earth -- or at least can be so interpreted. Finally, the memory of a Moonless Earth is
contained in the oral traditions of such Indians as those of the Bogota highlands in the
eastern Cordilleras of Columbia, i.e. according to tribesmen of Chibchas, “In
the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens.”
The
references to the aboriginal nature of the pre-Moon folk, and the fact they
lived before “the birth of Jove” is particularly noteworthy. While Velikovsky and those scholars
suggesting a Moonless Earth time, have never made the apparent connection to Sumerian records and the Anunnaki, many of whom of the latter have
a date of birth (or arrival in the environs of Earth) which would have occurred
after the time of some of Earth’s
original aborigines. In fact, the time
of a Moonless Earth might likely correspond to the time when Homo Erectus was roaming about the
planet, dwelling in mountains, eating
acorns, and becoming the archetype for future aborigines. The possible assumption that the Arcadians
were a civilization is without confirming evidence. In addition, the habit of Sumerians to
consider civilization and the world as an interchangeable term, does not
eliminate an Arcadian “civilization” as being essentially an aboriginal
one. Meanwhile, all the histories tie
together, all the pieces of the puzzle fit -- provided, of course, there is no
recarving of the puzzles to make them fit in an incorrect position.
Given
the distinct possibility of the Moon being a relative newcomer to its orbit
around the Earth, an arrival apparently prior
to the Anunnaki of Sumerian history, one might even consider seriously the even
more radical suggestion of the Moon being artificial. In the section on Lunatics, we considered this possibility
of a Moon being the ideal space ship, wherein one has all the comforts of home
(including a vast collection of kitchen sinks), and at the same time, can enjoy
an observational status wherein no one else (in particular, arrogant humans)
even suspects the existence of a nearby extraterrestrial intelligence.
Is it
possible that the Moon arrived with the Anunnaki -- either initially, or later
when it was apparent that an off-planet base was essential? Is this their “home away from home”, from
which they could observe the going ons down below, while still enjoying a
privacy from prying human eyes? Zecharia Sitchin [2] and others have noted that
there were Anunnaki “watchers” in the space surrounding the Earth -- and while
it might be assumed they were in artificial satellites in near-Earth orbit, no
one appears [until the writing of this essay] to have considered that the
artificial satellite upon which the Anunnaki were doing their watching (and
administering the trans-shipments of Gold back to Nibiru) was in fact the
Moon! And yet it makes total sense.
Adam and Eve being Lunatics is one case in point, where perhaps the genetic work of Enki and
Ninki was being conducted in an off-Earth-site location. The fact that Adam may have been preaching a
worship of the Moon is just more evidence of his possible birthplace, and the
location of his acknowledged creators.
Richard
Hoagland <http://www.lunaranomalies.com>
has suggested that the distinct differences between the near and far sides of
the Moon may be the result of interplanetary (or interstellar) war damages --
one side being blasted into “seas”, while the far side has no such, similar
“damage”! There is also the War of the Titans, and all sorts of warfare
going on among the Anunnaki, especially Enki and Enlil, in the earlier times.
The
reason the near side of the Moon is relatively smooth with few new craters is
due to the fact that it was covered with over 200 kilometers of
ice accumulated during its long space long voyage to Earth. When it was bounced
off Earth the ice was knocked off raising sea levels on Earth 300 feet 11,713 years ago
taking Earth out of the Ice Age.
It
might appear ancient history has not even begun to scratch the surface of
possibilities of Anunnaki residing on the Moon in the early days (as well as
now?), in a continuing series of “Prime Directive” Violations. It is even possible that Hoagland’s lunar
anomalies are the remnants of that Anunnaki war, and that there is still
Anunnaki in residence on “our” Moon.
Suddenly, the “Man in the Moon” takes on a greater credibility.
Furthermore,
an Anunnaki controlled artificial Moon might have allowed them to use it in
some fashion to cause the E.DIN conditions of a “perpetual dawn” on planet
Earth. The Moon could even be where
Enoch (Thoth) might have gone for his schooling at Anunnaki University . [One wonders what the prerequisites are, or
if the admission requirements are really tough.
A rampant curiosity might be important.]
When
the Anunnaki discovered Earth 12,000 years ago it had already lost 98% of its
atmosphere down from a high of 750 PSI down to 14 PSI. Earth was in an Ice Age
with huge ice caps on both poles and it had little arable land. The oceans were
not very productive because the sun beat down on the Equator all the time. It
was cold because most of the sunlight was reflected off the Ice Caps back into space.
The only way to revive Earth and replenish the atmosphere for larger
populations of humans and animals was to tilt it 23.5 degrees relative to the
Sun’s rays and increased volcanism with the Moon’s gravity. This released more
CO2 into the atmosphere. Obviously they had done this before.
Bringing
the Moon in by bouncing it off the Arctic Ocean tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees
relative to the Sun's rays which doubled arable land and doubled the plankton
growth in the oceans to replenish the oxygen. The book is: Cosmological Ice
Ages.
My
co-author and I used an online impact computer, Arizona.edu/impact effects. We
put the mass of the Moon in there, 8.35 E 22 kilograms (this
number included the 200-kilometer-thick coating of ice), the mass of the Earth
5.98 E 24 kilograms ,
an angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per
second. The resulting numbers that came back was that the Moon would depress
Earth’s crust five kilometers. The Arctic Ocean
is five kilometers deep above Alaska .
The force of impact was 700 terra-megatons. It killed off all the tribes,
horses, camels and mastodons in North America
at a time when there were few humans living there. Mastodons were found with
quick frozen with green food in their mouths caused by winds of 200+ miles per
hour and temperatures of -200 degrees Fahrenheit caused by the vacuum of space
behind the Moon.
There
is only one object up there in space close to Earth with enough mass to tilt
Earth 23.5 degrees and that object is the Moon. This had to be done to extend
the life of the planet a few extra thousand years to enable humans to become
conscious and become a type one civilization. (We are still a type zero.)
Finally,
while the Anunnaki might have been the Gods and Goddesses of Sumerian and other ancient civilizations, it is also possible
that the Anunnaki themselves might have had others to look up to and revere as
superior beings. That may also be why
they preferred the relative anonymity of having a natural looking space ship.
Why not?----Especially after terra-forming Earth to suit their needs. To
talk about this more call: (907) 283-1456 www.AlaskaPublishing.com and
www.GuardDogBooks.com
this makes sense. This would also explain the slight wobble the earth has. I had another thought, before i had read the theory of annunaki smashing their "moon" into the earth. When i was in school, a christian who's religious views were raised "in home" did a speech about how the earth could only be 6 000 years old. One of his main points was that the moon moved closer to the earth every year. My thought - not based on much scientific evidence, except for the ideas of pole-shifts - is that when the pole-shifts happened, which the last was about 13,000 years ago, the resulting shockwave that would have occured, pushed the moon out so you couldn't see it with the naked eye. Slowly, it moved back (which is where the idea sort-of crumbles) to where it is right now, which also explains why the earth is so far away when, supposedly, it's moving toward us.
ReplyDelete