How to win in court. UCC 1-207 explained

Dean Clifford, Menard, Bonacci and others are discovering how to win in court. Type their names into youtube.

I was saddled with two ten-year-long lawsuits. The lawyers and Judges drag these things out because they are making money off you. I wound up spending over $250,000 in legal fees for nothing. You only have forty years of useful productive life from age 25 to 65. After that, for the most part you are too old and disabled to start over building a retirement. Before age 25 you usually don’t know what to do with the rest of your life and you lack education. Two of these ten-year-long lawsuits will take half of your useful productive life away and there is nothing more wasteful. It wasn’t until I fired my lawyers that I started winning. Now that I understand how these very destructive type of lawsuits work they will never bother me again. The only problem now is that I am 69 years old and have wasted most of my life fighting bogus lawsuits before I got wise. Here is what you must do:    

When you go into court and you are asked to state your name, say:

I am the Executor and Beneficiary of the last will and testament of God.

What is your standing here?

Are you the Trustee?

What is your claim?

Who are you?         

What is your name?

I am administrating here. (You have to establish what roles the various people are playing in the courtroom. Once you have that established you are free to go.)

All courts use corporate law. There has to be three officers to make a corporation.

Corporate Law is the highest law in the land. It is god’s Law. It is the Holy Trinity. The Bible is God’s Last Will and Testament. Picture a triangle with God at the top and Jesus at lower left. Then you have the Holy Ghost at lower right. In a courtroom situation the Judge is the Executor/executioner at the top. The Holy Ghost is the corporate government at the right. The Holy Ghost government and the God/Executor/executioner is all the same thing while you are the beneficiary. Everyone in the courtroom is there for one thing: to take something from you rather it be your trust/money/life savings/insurance, house, land etc. or in some cases even your, life. Not much has changed since the days of the Inquisition...

All contract/corporate law operates by presumption. Practically every court in the land uses this highest form of law. They automatically turn your name into a corporate fiction with all capital letters so that the corporate/contract law will apply to your corporate fiction.

Under contract law you never want to be the trustee and you never want the Judge to be the Executor. Under contract law a person (you are a person or dead animal defined in Blacks Law) cannot hold the office of Beneficiary and Trustee or Executor and that’s exactly what is going on in the courtroom. In a courtroom the government holds two offices, the Executor/Judge and the Trustee who wants what you have. They want to throw you in jail, take away your trust and birth bond which is worth millions.

The Judge is not the Executor but he wants you to presume that he is. In reality, he is working for the government who is the trustee. His paycheck comes from the government but he gets a big bonus if he puts someone in jail. In most cases he also has his retirement pension invested in prison stocks therefore everyone he puts in prison benefits the prison company stockholders and fellow Judges...

The government holds everything in trust for the people. So when you walk into a courtroom you automatically have two corporate entities trying to get something from you rather it be for you to confess to a crime you did not do or to take something from you like your house, land, inheritance, IRA, life insurance etc., etc. You are the one that owns something that the lawyers want to get.

You can nullify all that right off if you establish what rolls the people are playing in the courtroom.

When you hire a lawyer to re-present you he has previously sworn an oath to the Barr Association that supersedes any kind of commitment that he has to re-present you. Therefor you have hired someone who is automatically on the side of the government. For the most part any money you give him for a retainer to re-present you is a big waste of money unless you know the attorney is really working for you and has a good chance of winning. About 3 percent of defendants actually win a case. Your odds of actually winning a case with a lawyer are quite small.

You then have a very small chance to contest this by asking the question: “Can I be bound to a contract when my lawyer has a superseding oath?” You can say: “He didn’t provide full disclosure and my lawyer allowed the trial to go forward with the “Presumption” that the Judge is both the Administrator and Executor (executioner).

Before you have been suckered into one of these contract courtrooms you definitely must establish a CLAIM OF RIGHT. Simply ask in writing: “Please provide proof of claim for something that you are alleging that I cannot do.” State: “My rights have a fee attached. My offers are non-negotiable. Violating any of my God given rights is a fee of ten-million dollars. You got 21 days to respond.

“Send me some facts or evidence of something I cannot do!”    

Say: “I plead guilty to the facts.”

All bureaucrats are non-productive entities. All they produce is paperwork. They need us because we are the only ones producing things. All others are parasites.

 If we are all equal under God, when did they get the power to command us?  Government is stealing our livelihood by printing more money and dreaming up bureaucratic hoops for us to jump through so they can sell us a license to line their pockets with more money before we are allowed to work for a living. The constant inflation and enactment of millions of statutes and regulations is taking our children’s future. We can’t get married, drive a car, dig a ditch; or a hundred other things without first paying off some bureaucrat for a permit or license. The license fees are supposed to pay for insurance and other bogus reclamation plans. It was the loggers, fishermen, miners and factory workers that built this nation. Maybe it’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff.

UCC 1-207

Every system of law has Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way out under the law.

Recourse provides that if you have been damaged under the law you can recover your loss.

When you go to court you are in Commercial International Jurisdiction. If you claim Constitutional Rights you can be charged with Contempt of Court.

You can’t be charged under one Jurisdiction and defend yourself in another!

So: In a UCC Court you must claim your Reservation of Rights under UCC 1-207.

The proper answer is: “The Law doesn’t apply to me.” Then you must make your reservation in which you are charged. UCC 1-207.

“Without Prejudice” is OK

When asked to explain say: “I reserve my right to be compelled to perform under any contract on Commercial Agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.” “I don not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unreserved contract or Commercial Agreement.”

UCC 1-203.6 ANDERSON

“The code is complimentary to the Common Law which remains in force except where displaced by the Code. A statute should be constructed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear Legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law.

UCC 1-206 ANDERSON Uniform Code Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company:

“The code cannot be read to preclude Common Law.”

Section UCC 103.c Say:

“I have a remedy under the UCC, to reserve my rights under Common Law. I have exercised the remedy and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law. To be in Harmony with Common Law you must come forth with the damaged party.”

If the Judge proceeds then ask: “Let me see if I understand. Your Honor, has the court made a , legal determination that Section 1-207 and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code which is the system of Law you are operating under are not valid law before this court?

If the answer is yes then say: “I put this court on notice that I am appealing your legal determination. The higher court will uphold the Code on appeal.”

When you sign a driver’s license, lease, buy a car, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, divorce decree etc. or any other document you have a right to draw a line through anything that is not in your interest. It can be a number, a word or group of words. A contract must have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. Add: Seller makes no express guarantees of sea worthiness or condition. Add: “UCC 1-207” or “Without Prejudice” then sign your name.   

Al Gore, Well you decide...

Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'

And yet he's STILL one of the liberal's top 'authorities' . . . facts don't matter, as long as you're appropriately liberal in your message . . . Al Gore: Earth's Interior 'Extremely Hot, Several Million Degrees'

By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)

November 18, 2009 - 10:27 ET

For several years as uneducated sycophants in the media gushed and fawned over every utterance from former Vice President Al Gore, News Busters has informed readers of just how absurd the junk science he's peddling really is.

Last Thursday, NBC "Tonight Show" viewers got a perfect example of how the Nobel Laureate basically makes things up, and that his poor grades in college were quite an indicator of just how little he understands about science.

So egregious was his departure from reality that the following clip should be mandatory viewing for all his fans in the media who seem to be just as scientifically-challenged (video embedded below the fold with partial transcript,

 Hot Air):

CONAN O'BRIEN, HOST: Now, what about ... you talk in the book about geothermal energy...

AL GORE, NOBEL LAUREATE: Yeah, yeah.

O'BRIEN: ...and that is, as I understand it, using the heat that's generated from the core of the earth ...

GORE: Yeah.

O'BRIEN: ...to create energy, and it sounds to me like an evil plan by Lex Luthor to defeat Superman. Can you, can you tell me, is this a viable solution, geothermal energy?

GORE: It definitely is, and it's a relatively new one. People think about geothermal energy - when they think about it at all - in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, 'cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot ...

On Tuesday, National Review's John Derbyshire noted:

The geothermal gradient is usually quoted as 25-50 degrees Celsius per mile of depth in normal terrain (not, e.g., in the crater of Kilauea). Two kilometers down, therefore, (that's a mile and a quarter if you're not as science-y as Al) you'll have an average gain of 30-60 degrees - exploitable for things like home heating, though not hot enough to make a nice pot of tea. The temperature at the earth's core, 4,000 miles down, is usually quoted as 5,000 degrees Celsius, though these guys claim it's much less, while some contrarian geophysicists have posted claims up to 9,000 degrees. The temperature at the surface of the Sun is around 6,000 degrees Celsius, while at the center, where nuclear fusion is going on bigtime, things get up over 10 million degrees.

If the temperature anywhere inside the earth was "several million degrees," we'd be a star.

The physics and astronomy website Physlink also contests Gore's absurd claim:

It is approximately 4000°C at the centre of the Earth. To put this in context:

1. The centre of the Sun is approximately 15 million°C

2. The surface of the Sun is 5500°C

3. Iron melts at 1535°C (when at atmospheric pressure)

4. Water boils at 100°C (when at atmospheric pressure)

5. Human skin is comfortable with temperatures up to about 60°C

6. The highest temperature recorded on the Earth's surface is 58°C (Libya 1922)

It is not possible to directly measure the temperature at the centre of the Earth and four thousand degrees is nothing more than our most well-established piece of guesswork to date. Most modern calculations rely on the fact that we believe the inner core to be made up of iron and nickel that is just about at melting point. It is under a lot of pressure, which prevents it from melting, even at such high temperatures. There is also a lot of evidence regarding how the outer core of the Earth convection and that helps to establish the temperature. However, recently British scientists have suggested that the temperature of the Earth's core may in fact be as high as the surface of the Sun, so the question is still open.

I believe the center of the Earth is a thorium and uranium reactor. During planet formation the heavier elements would tend to congregate near the center. Thorium is a rather abundant element rated at 32nd in abundance on the surface. In the 1950’s they discovered areas in South Africa during uranium mining where giant atomic reactions occurred cooking away for millions of years in the incredibly rich uranium ore deposit.

Another theory that throws this one in limbo is in Immanuel Velikovsky’s book IN THE BEGINNING. He says that the uranium found its way to Earth in relatively recent times. As be move around the Galazy at 11-million miles per hour you never know what will come to earth next.  

As such, whether it's 4,000 or 6,000 degrees, Gore's claim of "several million" is absurdly preposterous and not based on ANY scientific fact.

As Ed Morrissey observed Wednesday:

[A]nyone who followed the controversy over Gore's piece of cinematic fantasy An Inconvenient Truth knows that Gore tells a lot of very convenient untruths in his quest to create a market for his carbon-trading company. However, this is just flat-out ignorance that with any other person in any other context would destroy their credibility. This is worse than Tom Cruise telling Matt Lauer that he can debunk the entire psychiatric field because he's read a few books. If Gore can't get this rather basic fact right, why should he be believed on anything else in the energy field?

This raises an obvious question: in a world where media fact-check a comedy skit and a book written by a former governor, shouldn't they equally scrutinize statements being made by a man who's actively pushing for the passage of economically impactful legislation currently before Congress?

Or is that asking too much from so-called journalists?

Consider that if Gore was a Republican, his numerous departures from fact would have so discredited him years ago that he would now be considered a total joke.By contrast, because he's a Democrat who preaches liberal gospel, he can say whatever he wants without any regard for its accuracy and not only receive media's praise for his inexcusable errance, but an Oscar and a Nobel Peace Prize to boot.

As the Russian comedian Yakov Smirnoff was famous for saying years ago, "America -- what a country!"

*****Update: NewsBusters reader Eric Peterkofsky pointed out at Facebook that Newsweek recently called Gore "The Thinking Man's Thinking Man." 

Moon used to take us out of Ice Age give us more time.

The Anunnaki own the Moon and it is Nibiru

NO MOON UNTIL 12,713 YEARS AGO

Giordano Bruno (a 16th century Italian philosopher) is reputed to have written in De Immenso: (Bk IV, x, pp. 56-57):  “There are those who have believed that there was a certain time (as our Mythologian says) when the moon, which was believed to be younger than the sun, was not yet created.  The Arcadians, who dwelt not far from the Po, are believed to have been in existence before it (the moon).”  “Theodorus writes in his first book that the moon had appeared a little while before the war which was fought by Hercules against the giants.  Aristochius and Dionysius Chalcidensis, in the first of their works, confirm the same.”  “Mnaseas said that the Arcadians were born before the moon, and so they were called ‘proselenian’; meaning, ‘before the moon’.” [1] 

 

Bruno goes on to step upon the sensibilities of future scholars by noting that, “the earth, which is of the same species as the moon, is of creatable and destructible substance, and is truly animal and even mortal, although divine.  Therefore, the planets (worlds) are able to be created and destroyed, and it is not possible that they have been eternal, since we have proved them to be alterable and consisting of changing parts.” [1]  [emphasis added] 

 

Velikovsky <http://www.varchive.org/itb/sansmoon.htm> has discussed this same idea by noting that one of the most remote recollections of mankind is in regard to the period of Earth’s history when it was Moonless.  Velikovsky quotes everyone from Democritus and Anaxagoras to Aristotle and Apollonius of Rhodes to show that such a pre-Hellenic time existed.  Those humans living at the time were called Pelasgians, Proselenes (“before the Moon”), and Arcadians (pre-Danai and pre-Deukalion).  They were said to have dwelt in the mountains, fed on acorns, and lived as aborigines. [See below.]  

Plutarch, Hippolytus, Censorinus, and a doubting Lucian wrote of pre-Lunar people, as did Ovid, who said that the Arcadians possessed their land before the birth of Jove, and were older than the Moon.  There are even Biblical references (Job 25:5 and Psalm 72:5) which allude to a Moonless Earth -- or at least can be so interpreted.  Finally, the memory of a Moonless Earth is contained in the oral traditions of such Indians as those of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Columbia, i.e. according to tribesmen of Chibchas, “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens.”

  

The references to the aboriginal nature of the pre-Moon folk, and the fact they lived before “the birth of Jove” is particularly noteworthy.  While Velikovsky and those scholars suggesting a Moonless Earth time, have never made the apparent connection to Sumerian records and the Anunnaki, many of whom of the latter have a date of birth (or arrival in the environs of Earth) which would have occurred after the time of some of Earth’s original aborigines.  In fact, the time of a Moonless Earth might likely correspond to the time when Homo Erectus was roaming about the planet, dwelling in mountains, eating acorns, and becoming the archetype for future aborigines.  The possible assumption that the Arcadians were a civilization is without confirming evidence.  In addition, the habit of Sumerians to consider civilization and the world as an interchangeable term, does not eliminate an Arcadian “civilization” as being essentially an aboriginal one.  Meanwhile, all the histories tie together, all the pieces of the puzzle fit -- provided, of course, there is no recarving of the puzzles to make them fit in an incorrect position. 

 

Given the distinct possibility of the Moon being a relative newcomer to its orbit around the Earth, an arrival apparently prior to the Anunnaki of Sumerian history, one might even consider seriously the even more radical suggestion of the Moon being artificial.  In the section on Lunatics, we considered this possibility of a Moon being the ideal space ship, wherein one has all the comforts of home (including a vast collection of kitchen sinks), and at the same time, can enjoy an observational status wherein no one else (in particular, arrogant humans) even suspects the existence of a nearby extraterrestrial intelligence.

Is it possible that the Moon arrived with the Anunnaki -- either initially, or later when it was apparent that an off-planet base was essential?  Is this their “home away from home”, from which they could observe the going ons down below, while still enjoying a privacy from prying human eyes?  Zecharia Sitchin [2] and others have noted that there were Anunnaki “watchers” in the space surrounding the Earth -- and while it might be assumed they were in artificial satellites in near-Earth orbit, no one appears [until the writing of this essay] to have considered that the artificial satellite upon which the Anunnaki were doing their watching (and administering the trans-shipments of Gold back to Nibiru) was in fact the Moon!  And yet it makes total sense.  

Adam and Eve being Lunatics is one case in point, where perhaps the genetic work of Enki and Ninki was being conducted in an off-Earth-site location.  The fact that Adam may have been preaching a worship of the Moon is just more evidence of his possible birthplace, and the location of his acknowledged creators. 

 

Richard Hoagland <http://www.lunaranomalies.com> has suggested that the distinct differences between the near and far sides of the Moon may be the result of interplanetary (or interstellar) war damages -- one side being blasted into “seas”, while the far side has no such, similar “damage”!  There is also the War of the Titans, and all sorts of warfare going on among the Anunnaki, especially Enki and Enlil, in the earlier times.

The reason the near side of the Moon is relatively smooth with few new craters is due to the fact that it was covered with over 200 kilometers of ice accumulated during its long space long voyage to Earth. When it was bounced off Earth the ice was knocked off raising sea levels on Earth 300 feet 11,713 years ago taking Earth out of the Ice Age.

   

It might appear ancient history has not even begun to scratch the surface of possibilities of Anunnaki residing on the Moon in the early days (as well as now?), in a continuing series of “Prime Directive” Violations.  It is even possible that Hoagland’s lunar anomalies are the remnants of that Anunnaki war, and that there is still Anunnaki in residence on “our” Moon.  Suddenly, the “Man in the Moon” takes on a greater credibility.  

Furthermore, an Anunnaki controlled artificial Moon might have allowed them to use it in some fashion to cause the E.DIN conditions of a “perpetual dawn” on planet Earth.  The Moon could even be where Enoch (Thoth) might have gone for his schooling at Anunnaki University.  [One wonders what the prerequisites are, or if the admission requirements are really tough.  A rampant curiosity might be important.] 

When the Anunnaki discovered Earth 12,000 years ago it had already lost 98% of its atmosphere down from a high of 750 PSI down to 14 PSI. Earth was in an Ice Age with huge ice caps on both poles and it had little arable land. The oceans were not very productive because the sun beat down on the Equator all the time. It was cold because most of the sunlight was reflected off the Ice Caps back into space. The only way to revive Earth and replenish the atmosphere for larger populations of humans and animals was to tilt it 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun’s rays and increased volcanism with the Moon’s gravity. This released more CO2 into the atmosphere. Obviously they had done this before.

Bringing the Moon in by bouncing it off the Arctic Ocean tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun's rays which doubled arable land and doubled the plankton growth in the oceans to replenish the oxygen. The book is: Cosmological Ice Ages.

My co-author and I used an online impact computer, Arizona.edu/impact effects. We put the mass of the Moon in there, 8.35 E 22 kilograms (this number included the 200-kilometer-thick coating of ice), the mass of the Earth 5.98 E 24 kilograms, an angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per second. The resulting numbers that came back was that the Moon would depress Earth’s crust five kilometers. The Arctic Ocean is five kilometers deep above Alaska. The force of impact was 700 terra-megatons. It killed off all the tribes, horses, camels and mastodons in North America at a time when there were few humans living there. Mastodons were found with quick frozen with green food in their mouths caused by winds of 200+ miles per hour and temperatures of -200 degrees Fahrenheit caused by the vacuum of space behind the Moon.

There is only one object up there in space close to Earth with enough mass to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and that object is the Moon. This had to be done to extend the life of the planet a few extra thousand years to enable humans to become conscious and become a type one civilization. (We are still a type zero.)  

Finally, while the Anunnaki might have been the Gods and Goddesses of Sumerian and other ancient civilizations, it is also possible that the Anunnaki themselves might have had others to look up to and revere as superior beings.  That may also be why they preferred the relative anonymity of having a natural looking space ship. Why not?----Especially after terra-forming Earth to suit their needs.  To talk about this more call: (907) 283-1456 www.AlaskaPublishing.com    and     www.GuardDogBooks.com

Moon used to take Earth out of the Ice Age give us more time replenish the atmosphere.

The Anunnaki own the Moon and it is Nibiru

NO MOON UNTIL 12,714 YEARS AGO

Giordano Bruno (a 16th century Italian philosopher) is reputed to have written in De Immenso: (Bk IV, x, pp. 56-57):  “There are those who have believed that there was a certain time (as our Mythologian says) when the moon, which was believed to be younger than the sun, was not yet created.  The Arcadians, who dwelt not far from the Po, are believed to have been in existence before it (the moon).”  “Theodorus writes in his first book that the moon had appeared a little while before the war which was fought by Hercules against the giants.  Aristochius and Dionysius Chalcidensis, in the first of their works, confirm the same.”  “Mnaseas said that the Arcadians were born before the moon, and so they were called ‘proselenian’; meaning, ‘before the moon’.” [1]  

Bruno goes on to step upon the sensibilities of future scholars by noting that, “the earth, which is of the same species as the moon, is of creatable and destructible substance, and is truly animal and even mortal, although divine.  Therefore, the planets (worlds) are able to be created and destroyed, and it is not possible that they have been eternal, since we have proved them to be alterable and consisting of changing parts.” [1]  [emphasis added]  

Velikovsky <http://www.varchive.org/itb/sansmoon.htm> has discussed this same idea by noting that one of the most remote recollections of mankind is in regard to the period of Earth’s history when it was Moonless.  Velikovsky quotes everyone from Democritus and Anaxagoras to Aristotle and Apollonius of Rhodes to show that such a pre-Hellenic time existed.  Those humans living at the time were called Pelasgians, Proselenes (“before the Moon”), and Arcadians (pre-Danai and pre-Deukalion).  They were said to have dwelt in the mountains, fed on acorns, and lived as aborigines. [See below.]  

Plutarch, Hippolytus, Censorinus, and a doubting Lucian wrote of pre-Lunar people, as did Ovid, who said that the Arcadians possessed their land before the birth of Jove, and were older than the Moon.  There are even Biblical references (Job 25:5 and Psalm 72:5) which allude to a Moonless Earth -- or at least can be so interpreted.  Finally, the memory of a Moonless Earth is contained in the oral traditions of such Indians as those of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Columbia, i.e. according to tribesmen of Chibchas, “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens.”  

The references to the aboriginal nature of the pre-Moon folk, and the fact they lived before “the birth of Jove” is particularly noteworthy.  While Velikovsky and those scholars suggesting a Moonless Earth time, have never made the apparent connection to Sumerian records and the Anunnaki, many of whom of the latter have a date of birth (or arrival in the environs of Earth) which would have occurred after the time of some of Earth’s original aborigines.  In fact, the time of a Moonless Earth might likely correspond to the time when Homo Erectus was roaming about the planet, dwelling in mountains, eating acorns, and becoming the archetype for future aborigines.  The possible assumption that the Arcadians were a civilization is without confirming evidence.  In addition, the habit of Sumerians to consider civilization and the world as an interchangeable term, does not eliminate an Arcadian “civilization” as being essentially an aboriginal one.  Meanwhile, all the histories tie together, all the pieces of the puzzle fit -- provided, of course, there is no recarving of the puzzles to make them fit in an incorrect position.  

Given the distinct possibility of the Moon being a relative newcomer to its orbit around the Earth, an arrival apparently prior to the Anunnaki of Sumerian history, one might even consider seriously the even more radical suggestion of the Moon being artificial.  In the section on Lunatics, we considered this possibility of a Moon being the ideal space ship, wherein one has all the comforts of home (including a vast collection of kitchen sinks), and at the same time, can enjoy an observational status wherein no one else (in particular, arrogant humans) even suspects the existence of a nearby extraterrestrial intelligence.

Is it possible that the Moon arrived with the Anunnaki -- either initially, or later when it was apparent that an off-planet base was essential?  Is this their “home away from home”, from which they could observe the going ons down below, while still enjoying a privacy from prying human eyes?  Zecharia Sitchin [2] and others have noted that there were Anunnaki “watchers” in the space surrounding the Earth -- and while it might be assumed they were in artificial satellites in near-Earth orbit, no one appears [until the writing of this essay] to have considered that the artificial satellite upon which the Anunnaki were doing their watching (and administering the trans-shipments of Gold back to Nibiru) was in fact the Moon!  And yet it makes total sense.  

Adam and Eve being Lunatics is one case in point, where perhaps the genetic work of Enki and Ninki was being conducted in an off-Earth-site location.  The fact that Adam may have been preaching a worship of the Moon is just more evidence of his possible birthplace, and the location of his acknowledged creators.  

Richard Hoagland <http://www.lunaranomalies.com> has suggested that the distinct differences between the near and far sides of the Moon may be the result of interplanetary (or interstellar) war damages -- one side being blasted into “seas”, while the far side has no such, similar “damage”!  There is also the War of the Titans, and all sorts of warfare going on among the Anunnaki, especially Enki and Enlil, in the earlier times.

The reason the near side of the Moon is relatively smooth with few new craters is due to the fact that it was covered with over 200 kilometers of ice accumulated during its long space long voyage to Earth. When it was bounced off Earth the ice was knocked off raising sea levels on Earth 300 feet 11,713 years ago taking Earth out of the Ice Age.

   

It might appear ancient history has not even begun to scratch the surface of possibilities of Anunnaki residing on the Moon in the early days (as well as now?), in a continuing series of “Prime Directive” Violations.  It is even possible that Hoagland’s lunar anomalies are the remnants of that Anunnaki war, and that there is still Anunnaki in residence on “our” Moon.  Suddenly, the “Man in the Moon” takes on a greater credibility.  

Furthermore, an Anunnaki controlled artificial Moon might have allowed them to use it in some fashion to cause the E.DIN conditions of a “perpetual dawn” on planet Earth.  The Moon could even be where Enoch (Thoth) might have gone for his schooling at Anunnaki University.  [One wonders what the prerequisites are, or if the admission requirements are really tough.  A rampant curiosity might be important.]  

When the Anunnaki discovered Earth 12,000 years ago it had already lost 98% of its atmosphere down from a high of 750 PSI down to 14 PSI. Earth was in an Ice Age with huge ice caps on both poles and it had little arable land. The oceans were not very productive because the sun beat down on the Equator all the time. It was cold because most of the sunlight was reflected off the Ice Caps back into space. The only way to revive Earth and replenish the atmosphere for larger populations of humans and animals was to tilt it 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun’s rays and increased volcanism with the Moon’s gravity. This released more CO2 into the atmosphere. Obviously they had done this before.

Bringing the Moon in by bouncing it off the Arctic Ocean tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees relative to the Sun's rays which doubled arable land and doubled the plankton growth in the oceans to replenish the oxygen. The book is: Cosmological Ice Ages.

My co-author and I used an online impact computer, Arizona.edu/impact effects. We put the mass of the Moon in there, 8.35 E 22 kilograms (this number included the 200-kilometer-thick coating of ice), the mass of the Earth 5.98 E 24 kilograms, an angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per second. The resulting numbers that came back was that the Moon would depress Earth’s crust five kilometers. The Arctic Ocean is five kilometers deep above Alaska. The force of impact was 700 terra-megatons. It killed off all the tribes, horses, camels and mastodons in North America at a time when there were few humans living there. Mastodons were found with quick frozen with green food in their mouths caused by winds of 200+ miles per hour and temperatures of -200 degrees Fahrenheit caused by the vacuum of space behind the Moon.

There is only one object up there in space close to Earth with enough mass to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and that object is the Moon. This had to be done to extend the life of the planet a few extra thousand years to enable humans to become conscious and become a type one civilization. (We are still a type zero.)  

Finally, while the Anunnaki might have been the Gods and Goddesses of Sumerian and other ancient civilizations, it is also possible that the Anunnaki themselves might have had others to look up to and revere as superior beings.  That may also be why they preferred the relative anonymity of having a natural looking space ship. Why not?----Especially after terra-forming Earth to suit their needs.  To talk about this more call: (907) 283-1456 www.AlaskaPublishing.com    and     www.GuardDogBooks.com

NO GW/GC Earth is currently in an ice age.

After the planets were formed and our Sun drifted out of its birthplace in Orion Earth was in an Ice Age for more than one billion years known as the Huronian Glaciation. Earth had a 750 PSI atmosphere that extended more than 2,500 miles above the planet. There was no way the sun could break through such an atmosphere to thaw the mile-deep ice sheets over the oceans to get life started.

The only thing around us that could possibly penetrate such a thick atmosphere is the 1.5 solar mass Sirius B, a white dwarf orbiting Sirius A at 8 to 12 AU every 54 years. We matched its speed and went into orbit around Sirius 650-million years ago. The additional light and heat from these powerful stars melted the 5-mile ice sheets on Earth and got life started in the oceans to release free oxygen.

Earth had no ice caps for the next 650-million years. It was the additional light and heat from the sirius system that created most of the coal, oil and limestone on Earth. Then about 2.5 million years ago something blew up in Orion and kicked our Sun into an elliptical orbit around Sirius. To find out what read my book, Cosmological Ice Ages

Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission G. V. CHILINGAR,1 L. F. KHILYUK,1, and O. G. SOROKHTIN2 1Rudolf W. Gunnerman Energy and Environment Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA 2Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Address correspondence to George Chilingar, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, USA Branch, 101 S. Windsor Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90004. E-mail: gchil...@usc.edu Abstract The writers investigated the effect of CO2 emission on the temperature of atmosphere.

Computations based on the adiabatic theory of greenhouse effect show that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere results in cooling rather than warming of the Earth's atmosphere. Keywords adiabatic theory, CO2 emission, global cooling, global warming Introduction Traditional anthropogenic theory of currently observed global warming states that release of carbon dioxide into atmosphere (partially as a result of utilization of fossil fuels) leads to an increase in atmospheric temperature because the molecules of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) absorb the infrared radiation from the Earth's surface.

This statement is based on the Arrhenius hypothesis, which was never verified (Arrhenius, 1896). The proponents of this theory take into consideration only one component of heat transfer in atmosphere, i.e., radiation. Yet, in the dense Earth's troposphere with the pressure pa > 0:2 atm, the heat from the Earth's surface is mostly transferred by convection. (Sorokhtin, 2001a). According to our estimates, convection accounts for 67%, water vapor condensation in troposphere accounts for 25%, and radiation accounts for about 8% of the total heat transfer from the Earth's surface to troposphere. Thus, convection is the dominant process of heat transfer in troposphere, and all the theories of Earth's atmospheric heating (or cooling) first of all must consider this process of heat (energy)-mass redistribution in atmosphere (Sorokhtin, 2001a, 2001b; Khilyuk and Chilingar, 2003, 2004).

When the temperature of a given mass of air increases, it expands, becomes lighter, and rises. In turn, the denser cooler air of upper layers of troposphere descends and replaces the warmer air of lower layers. This physical system (multiple cells of air convection) acts in the Earth's troposphere like a continuous surface cooler. The cooling effect by air convection can surpass considerably the warming effect of radiation. The most important conclusion from this observation is that the temperature distribution in the troposphere has to be close to adiabatic because the air mass expands and cools while rising and compresses and heats while dropping. This does not necessarily imply that at any particular instant distribution of temperature has to be adiabatic. One should consider some averaged distribution over the time intervals of an order of months. Key Points of the Adiabatic Theory of Greenhouse Effect By definition, the greenhouse effect is the difference T between the average temperature of planet surface Ts and its effective temperature Te (which is determined by the solar radiation and the Earth's albedo): [much snippage of equations, graphs and text]

Figure 1. Relationship between the temperature and elevation above sea level for (1) existing nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere on Earth and (2) hypothetical carbon dioxide atmosphere.

Figure 2. Relationship between temperature and elevation above Venus surface for (1) existing carbon dioxide atmosphere, and (2) hypothetical nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere. The averaged temperature distributions for the existing carbon dioxide and hypothetical nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere on Venus are shown in

Figure 2. Conclusions During the latest three millennia, one can observe a clear cooling trend in the Earth's climate (Keigwin, 1996; Sorokhtin and Ushakov, 2002; Gerhard, 2004; Khiyuk and Chilingar, 2006; Sorokhtin et al., 2007). During this period, deviations of the global temperature from this trend reached up to 3iC with a clear trend of decreasing global temperature by about 2iC. Relatively short-term variations in global temperature are mainly caused by the variations in solar activity and are not linked to the changes in carbon dioxide content in atmosphere. Accumulation of large amounts of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leads to the cooling, and not to warming of climate, as the proponents of traditional anthropogenic global warming theory believe (Aeschbach-Hertig, 2006).

This conclusion has a simple physical explanation: when the infrared radiation is absorbed by the molecules of greenhouse gases, its energy is transformed into thermal expansion of air, which causes convective fluxes of air masses restoring the adiabatic distribution of temperature in the troposphere. Our estimates show that release of small amounts of carbon dioxide (several hundreds ppm), which are typical for the scope of anthropogenic emission, does not influence the global temperature of Earth's atmosphere.

References Arrhenius, S. 1896. On influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Phil. Mag. 41:237-276. Aeschbach-Hertig, W. 2007. Rebuttal of "On global forces of nature driving the Earth's climate. Are humans involved?" by L. F. Khilyuk and G. V. Chilingar. Env. Geol. Bachinskiy, A. I., Putilov, V. V., and Suvorov, N. P. 1951. Handbook of Physics. Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 380 pp. Gerhard, L. C. 2004. Climate change: Conflict of observational science, theory, and politics. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 88:1211-1220. Keigwin, L. D. 1996. The little ice age and medieval warm period in the Sargasso Sea. Science 274:1504-1508. Khilyuk, L. F., Chilingar, G. V., Endres, B., and Robertson, J. 2000. Gas Migration. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, 389 pp. Khilyuk, L. F., and Chilingar, G. V. 2003. Global warming: Are we confusing cause and effect?

Energy Sources 25:357-370. Khilyuk, L. F., and Chilingar, G. V. 2004. Global warming and long-term climatic changes: A progress report. Environ. Geol. 46:970-979. Khilyuk, L. F., and Chilingar, G. V. 2006. On global forces of nature driving the Earth's climate. Are humans involved? Environ. Geol. 50:899-910. Landau, L. D., and Lifshits, E. M. 1979. Statistical Physics. Moscow: Nauka, 559 pp. Marov, M. Ya. 1986. Planets of Solar System, Moscow: Nauka, 320 pp. Robinson, A. B., Baliunas, S. L., Soon, W., and Robinson, Z. W. 1998. Environmental effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. [i...@oism.org; i...@marshall.org] Schimel, D. S. 1995. Global Change Biology, 1:77-91. Sorokhtin, O. G. 1990. The greenhouse effect of atmosphere in geologic history of Earth. Doklady AN SSSR 315:587-592. Sorokhtin, O. G. 2001a. Greenhouse effect: Myth and reality. Vestnik Russian Academy of Natural Sciences 1:8-21. Sorokhtin, O. G. 2001b.

Temperature distribution in the Earth. Izvestiya RAN, Physics of Earth 3:71-78. Sorokhtin, O. G., and Ushakov, S. A. 2002. Evolution of the Earth. Moscow: Moscow Univ. Publishers, 560 pp. Sorokhtin, O. G., Chilingar, G. V., and Khilyuk, L. F. 2007. Global Warming and Global Cooling. Evolution of Climate on Earth. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 313 pp. Sorokhtin, O. G., Chilingar, G. V., Khilyuk, L. F., and Gorfunkel, M. V. 2006. Evolution of the Earth's global climate. Energy Sources 29:1-19. Venus (Atmosphere, Surface and Ecosystem). 1989. Moscow: Nedra, 482 pp. Voytkevitch, G. V., Kokin, A. V., Miroshnikov, A. E., and Prokhorov, V. G. 1990. Handbook of Geochemistry. Moscow: Nedra, 480 pp.

NO SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION! There is no logical explanation for the coal deposits 100-feet thick and limestone layers 12,500-feet thick laid down during the Carboniferous Era—especially with our sun as the only light source. To begin with, our sun is not an ideal grow light and it doesn’t suddenly change its spectrum into the UV! Hard coal has a 40 to 1 compression ratio and soft coal is 20 to 1 In order to have layers of coal 100-feet thick in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Colorado and Wyoming—even during an 80-million-year warm spell would requires 4,000 feet of plant growth (carbon) removed out of the air and then compressed down to 100 feet and this is impossible under present atmospheric conditions. The only possible explanation to account for such extreme plant growth would be an input of UV light 24-hours a day and a 200-pound per square inch atmosphere with carbon dioxide at 10 to 12%. This strengthens our position immensely that our Sun was in a close 1/10th light year circular orbit around the Sirius A & B binary star system which is the only object in space capable of doubling incoming UV light to Earth!

During the Carboniferous Era 400-million to 320-million years ago the average temperature of Earth was as high as 80 degrees F. The average temperature on Earth today is 32 degrees F. –Time-Life books Weather and Climate We have a long way to go before we have true global warming. The only reason we are not in an Ice Age right now is because somebody brought the Moon in and tilted the Earth 23.5 degrees. Our Sun doesn’t have enough power to keep us out of Ice Ages otherwise we wouldn’t have them! In my book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES & GLOBAL WARMING we explain who brought the Moon in and how we got blasted into our present 90 to 1 elliptical orbit around the Sirius system three-million years ago. Now we go out to nine light years and everything freezes up. We are now at 8.5 light years from Sirius and heading back at a speed of 7.5 kilometers per second so we can eventually expect some global warming as we enter warmer space around the Sirius system.

The gravity in that neighborhood is twenty times greater than our sun so we will eventually be traveling at a speed of about 200 kilometers per second. The Kuppier belts of our Sun and the Sirius star system is already starting to interact. Regarding carbon dioxide absorption: In the process of photosynthesis certain carbohydrates are synthesized from carbon dioxide and water in the chloroplasts of living plant cells, oxygen being a byproduct and light the source of energy. The chemical equation for the process is: 6CO2+6H2O+673 kg. cal of radiant energy  C2H12+6O2. A hexose sugar is conventionally considered to be the basic carbohydrate product of photosynthesis, although in actuality the situation is much more complex. Most of the carbon dioxide used is diffuses into the leaf through the stomates and dissolves in wet cell walls bordering the intercellular spaces, from where it diffuses in solution into the chloroplasts. In most cases less than 1% of the water absorbed is used in photosynthesis. This negates mainstream know-it-all statements that most of the oxygen released in the process of photosynthesis comes from water and not from carbon dioxide. Carbon Dioxide is not a greenhouse gas because it tends to hug the ground near where it is released. That is why there is a timberline.

Trees won’t grow above a certain altitude because there isn’t enough CO2 (plant food). Carbon dioxide weighs 1.977 grams per cubic liter as compared with Nitrogen at 1.2506 grams per liter and Oxygen 1.429 grams per liter. In other words, Carbon dioxide is 36.743% heavier than Nitrogen and 27.72% heavier than oxygen. –Thomas J. Glover Pocket reference Urban areas also suffer from lack of oxygen because so many people are burning things. Human release of CO2 affects the climate very minimally except around urban areas where there is a high concentration displacing oxygen and nitrogen because it makes up such a small percentage of our atmosphere—only .033%.

The global mean surface "Temp"erature data are the GISS adjusted J-D yearly land and sea average, available from NASA at:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt The "CO2" data are the yearly averages of the monthly data from the Keeling curve measured at Mauna Loa, available at: ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_mm_mlo.txt

DRASTIC POPULATION REDUCTION

In the midst of a world-wide drought, and a stock market collapse Henry Kissinger released the April 1974 classified memo. National Security Study memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) was shaped by Rockefeller interests and aimed to adopt a “World Population Plan to action” for drastic global population control i.e. reduction. The US lead the effort, making birth control in developing countries a prerequisite for US aid. Engdahl summed it up in blunt terms; “If these inferior races get in the way of our securing ample, cheap, raw materials, then we must find ways to get rid of them.” The NAZI also aimed big and sought control of the world.

Population culling or “eugenics” was part of their scheme to target “inferior” races to preserve the “superior” one. Kissinger’s scheme of “simpler contraceptive methods through bio-medical research” was reminiscent of DuPont’s old slogan, “Better things for better living” which was later dropped for, “Better things fore better living through chemistry.” As evidence increased in the toxic effect of chemicals they began using the new slogan, “The Miracles of Science.” Kissinger’s plan had two aims. 1. Secure US grain markets. 2. Control populations. Thirteen unlucky countries were chosen, India, Brazil, Nigeria, Mexico and Indonesia to mention a few. Exploiting their resources depended on instituting drastic population reductions to reduce home-grown demand.

Automobiles kill about 63,000 people in the US each year. There are 21,000 deaths per year in the US from radon gas and radon and 400,000 deaths from radon world wide! This is amazing because this is about 1/3 the number of deaths from auto accidents and you never hear anything about this horrible threat to human health and the environment. Big business must keep this secret and keep us focused on bogus disinformation such as GW and GC. Can you imagine how much Hell would break out if there were 20 deaths from bird flue in the US? When someone died from botulism from eating peanut butter we heard about on the news for over a week! They have been telling us there is no radon on the planet and the propaganda goes on and on so they can keep on burning fossil fuels.

Global Warming was invented to keep us focused away from more dire threats to human health and the Environment. The .033% trace gas carbon dioxide is plant food necessary for us to grow crops and to sustain the ecosystem yet our government is talking about using diesel fuel to pump it underground. A recent Scientific American article proposes erecting a giant sun shade made of reflective material above the earth to reflect sunlight back into space at a cost of trillions of dollars??

Soil erosion is the “silent global crisis” undermining food production and water availability. Every year, some 62,000 square miles of land looses its vegetation and becomes degraded or turns into desert. A Cornell University study, which pulls together statistics on soil erosion from more than 125 sources, has found that the US is loosing soil 10 times faster—and China and India 30 to 40 times faster—than the natural replenishment rate. As a result of erosion over the past 40 years, 30 percent of the world arable land has become unproductive--this at a time when the world population is approaching 7 billion.

Food production has kept pace with population growth by increasing by 50 percent between 1980 and 2000. But it is an open question whether there will be enough food in 2050, with an estimated three billion more mouths to feed. That means more food has to be produced within the next 50 years than during the last 10,000 years combined. --(source: The Global Report, 30 August 2007 To learn more how these plans are instituted and controlled by the people who own the Federal Reserve System of banks (that have nothing to do with the US government) buy my book: The Frog is Cooked. www.GuarddogBooks.com and www.AlaskaPublishing.com

BIGGEST KILLERS Heart disease is the number one killer on the world today killing 7.2 million people every year. The increasing numbers are possibly due to better detection and diagnostic methods. Cancer and asthma rank second and third. Cancer kills 560,000 Americans each year. Many of these deaths are preventable though proper education. Whenever the US invades a foreign sovereign nation like Iraq the number of deaths from war is ramped up to around 500,000. The unthinkable all-out war using WOMD would kill millions. The fourth cause of death in the world would be starvation—mostly due the corporate takeover of food production which produce genetically modified foods with no food value. It is estimated that the introduction of GM foods will reduce world population by an estimated three billion within the next ten years.

These are the very same foods that are the leading cause cancer and heart disease. Bankrupting family farms was the plan to remove an “excess of human resources”. Engdahl called it “a thinly veiled form of food imperialism” as part of a scheme for the US to become “the world granary.” The small family farm had to go. Agriculture had to be turned into “agribusiness” dominated by a few corporate giants with incestuous ties to Washington. Dollar devaluation was also part of the scheme. Under Nixon’s economic plan the gold window was closed in 1971 to let the currency float freely. Developing nations were targeted as well with the idea that they forget about being food-self-sufficient in grains and beef, rely on America for key commodities and concentrate instead on small fruits, sugar and vegetables for export.

Earned foreign exchange could then buy US imports and repay International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank loans that create a never-ending cycle of debt slavery. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was also used, as was later the WTO with rules written by corporations to suit their bottom line. www.GuardDogBooks.com www.AlaskaPublishing.com Trafford.com