HOW TO LIVE IN THE MATRIX AND DEMAND THEIR AUTHROITY

LIVING IN THE MATRIX

Follow the white rabbit...."You have a problem with authority, Mr. Anderson. Somehow you think that you're special and that rules don't apply to you..." Actually agent Smith is simply a Matrix ENFORCER. You can't beat him unless you see (understand) the Matrix code. And in the real world, the Matrix code is the UCC. You can shut down even the IRS with it. I did. And that's because all the municipal corporations that masquerade as gov't, operate IN COMMERCE, and the UCC is the law of commerce. And in commerce you're either a CREDITOR or a DEBTOR. So we have basically two choices; either leave the corporate Matrix, which will make life rather difficult, since most people are in the Matrix (where real gold money is NOT accepted), OR operate in the Matrix, in which case you better learn the UCC and assert your CREDITOR status, and so be like Neo in the movie. I hope you realize that it is the CREDITOR status which makes people EXEMPT from the rules that everyone else (debtors) is under. Or simply assert all the rights that the UCC affords. For example, when some Matrix agency gives you a presentment, you gotta pay if you accept it, and it's deemed accepted even if you do nothing, and if you reject it, you're in DISHONOR. In which case they can drag you into court. BUT if you demand that they identify themselves and their authority as a holder in due course, their presentment becomes INVALID, UNTIL they satisfy that demand, as it is based on the UCC code. And here's a good analysis of the Matrix movies: BTW, this is also revealing. Remember that IRS claims that everyone working and living in United States must pay income taxes? Here's where that United States is: "UCC § 9-307. LOCATION OF DEBTOR. (h) [Location of United States.] The United States is located in the District of Columbia." Of course it also includes all US territories and federal ZIP code areas. And this is also a part of every State's commercial Code. For example in Cali it's under CCC 9307 (h). And I wonder what would an IRS employee say if you told him "I'm not located in District of Columbia. You don't disagree with that, do you?". I mean, if he agreed, then he'd be agreeing that you're NOT in United States, and IRS by their own admission only has authority over those in US. In order to defeat your enemies, you first gotta UNDERSTAND WHY they have power and you don't.

Comment by Jaro 15 hours ago

Here's the Merovingian scene. Yep, they came to him with no power, and gave him no reason why he should grant their request for the keymaker. And they didn't even know why they needed him. I.e. they created no cause, which would have an effect of the Merovingian granting their wish.

And the Merovingian demonstrated to them on that woman, how he created a cause (by that special desert), which would have an effect of her being open to his sexual advances later on. So you gotta create a certain action, if you want to cause certain reaction.

And it also works backwards; if you wanna stop certain effect, you first gotta know what is the cause which creates that effect. If you don't know the cause, you can't change the effect. 

Want this lech for President?

Another Bill Clinton???

www.GuardDogBooks.com

Obamacare decision

> Obamacare decision raises issues of justices' impeachment
>
> The six U.S. Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold ObamaCare
> should be impeached for abandoning the rule of law, explains attorney
> Larry Klayman. Klayman stated Thursday morning: "These six Justices
> have violated their own long-established rules of interpretation for
> applying statutes to instead advance their own political objectives or
> burnish their public persona. Such personal goals corrode the role of
> the Court. The Justices abandoned the rule of law and have become
> merely a political focus group."
>
> As Justice Antonin Scalia makes clear in his dissent, the Justices
> actually rewrote the Affordable Care Act instead of interpreting it.
> Scalia wrote in dissent that the legacy of the Roberts Court will be
> "forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United
> States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it
> takes to uphold and assist its favorites." Scalia explained that the
> Court engaged in "somersaults of statutory interpretation" to save
> ObamaCare, rather than applying neutral and consistent rules to all
> laws equally.
>
> Freedom Watch has grown especially concerned about the independence of
> the Supreme Court due to reports from a whistleblower that private
> information about Chief Justice John Roberts, and other judges and
> justices, were "harvested" illegally by the U.S. Government. Although
> it is illegal for the Central Intelligence Agency to operate within the
> domestic United States, a contractor whose company was hired to perform
> the "harvesting" for the CIA has come forward to blow the whistle. He
> claims to have proof that the CIA harvested personal and private
> information about Roberts and other federal judges and may be
> intimidating or subtly threatening the U.S. Supreme Court with the fear
> of personal attacks.
>
> To preserve the Republic in its last gasps, Congress must impeach these
> Justices. The U.S. Constitution provides in Article III, Section 1,
> that "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
> their Offices during good Behavior." It does not give judges a term for
> life but only "during good Behavior."
>
> Klayman is a former federal prosecutor, head of Freedom Watch and
> previously founder of Judicial Watch.
>
> For more information, contact daj142182@gmail.com or visit
> www.freedomwatchusa.org//>
>