Saturday, June 27, 2015

Obamacare decision

> Obamacare decision raises issues of justices' impeachment
>
> The six U.S. Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold ObamaCare
> should be impeached for abandoning the rule of law, explains attorney
> Larry Klayman. Klayman stated Thursday morning: "These six Justices
> have violated their own long-established rules of interpretation for
> applying statutes to instead advance their own political objectives or
> burnish their public persona. Such personal goals corrode the role of
> the Court. The Justices abandoned the rule of law and have become
> merely a political focus group."
>
> As Justice Antonin Scalia makes clear in his dissent, the Justices
> actually rewrote the Affordable Care Act instead of interpreting it.
> Scalia wrote in dissent that the legacy of the Roberts Court will be
> "forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United
> States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it
> takes to uphold and assist its favorites." Scalia explained that the
> Court engaged in "somersaults of statutory interpretation" to save
> ObamaCare, rather than applying neutral and consistent rules to all
> laws equally.
>
> Freedom Watch has grown especially concerned about the independence of
> the Supreme Court due to reports from a whistleblower that private
> information about Chief Justice John Roberts, and other judges and
> justices, were "harvested" illegally by the U.S. Government. Although
> it is illegal for the Central Intelligence Agency to operate within the
> domestic United States, a contractor whose company was hired to perform
> the "harvesting" for the CIA has come forward to blow the whistle. He
> claims to have proof that the CIA harvested personal and private
> information about Roberts and other federal judges and may be
> intimidating or subtly threatening the U.S. Supreme Court with the fear
> of personal attacks.
>
> To preserve the Republic in its last gasps, Congress must impeach these
> Justices. The U.S. Constitution provides in Article III, Section 1,
> that "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
> their Offices during good Behavior." It does not give judges a term for
> life but only "during good Behavior."
>
> Klayman is a former federal prosecutor, head of Freedom Watch and
> previously founder of Judicial Watch.
>
> For more information, contact daj142182@gmail.com or visit
www.freedomwatchusa.org//>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment