Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts

Monday, March 2, 2015

Government Corruption

                                                                                                2015-001469-0
                                                                                    Recording District 302 Kenai
02/27/2015  11:30 AM  Page one 1of 10



When recorded send to:
Henry: Frederick of the Kroll family
513 Peninsula Avenue
Kenai, Alaska [99611-9998]
                                    SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY
===========================================================================
   NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT AND
                                                         BILL IN EQUITY
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society (STATE) is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the State of Alaska does business as a corporation with an IRS EIN number 92-6001185 and the transactions are not always in the best interest of the people, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the State of Alaska sells the people’s resources for billions of dollars and the transactions are not always in the best interest of the people for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Alaska is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,
Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a Social Security Number are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one & rsquo;s Social Security Number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in Alaska have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that when your parents sign up for it, you get a Birth Certificate, which gives you certain RIGHTS to gov't benefits. And that's in return for you depositing your SOVEREIGNTY with the federal gov't. You see, American people are sovereign, and as such they're not liable for the national debt or income taxes, and the gov't needs someone to back up their fiat 'money' scheme and spending, without them being responsible for it so they have created this criminal scheme, and,
Whereas I, Henry-Frederick of the Kroll family was born a free man and child of God on a vessel floating on navigable waters near the town of Seldovia before Alaska was a state, and,
My mother, the Public Health Nurse, signed my certificate of live birth as the attending physician, and,
Whereas sometime after statehood the State of Alaska illegally absorbed my STANDARD CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH and crossed out the original Register Number 21701 and put a blue boarder around it with a state seal and a state bond number 121462, and,
Whereas the STATE OF ALASKA CORPORATION monetized me without my consent or knowledge and sold my fraudulent birth bond to investors, and,
Whereas I, Henry-Frederick of the Kroll family claim to be a Freeman-on-the-Land and not a corporate bonded slave sold into bondage by criminals, and,
Whereas "When your parents signed the birth certificate, they created a legal fiction called a straw man.  In commercial law it’s called a (homus straus?), which is a legal fiction or straw man. First the State registered it with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept. of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC (Depository Trust Company). This company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and settlement company. The DTC is nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE and company. That’s the nominee, and,
Whereas all your money goes through this company (DTC). This is the clearing corporation, clearing house and settlement depository for all commodities and securities. All commodities and securities are registered with CEDE and Co. under rule 12. Everybody is reading the UCC.  You should be reading SEC. Alpine publishing in NYC they have the national securities and exchange act of 1934.  There are two of them one in 1933, and one in 1934 - two different acts.  You should be studying these rules because what they're doing under rule 12 they are register your birth certificate. – Under rule 12 as a security.  They register this in the name of CEDE and Co. There are two types of securities Certificated and un-certificated.  What they do is issue a certificate. Isn’t that what it says on your birth (certificate of live birth)? When they register it they issue a certificate, it becomes a certificated security. And it’s registered in the name of CEDE and Co.   What does that make them?  It makes them the registered holder. This has nothing to do with debtor/creditor law.
Whereas you own everything and you don’t control anything.  They control everything why? Because they are the registered owner– of the certificated security (birth certificate) and they use this as collateral. You have to know what is going on before you go in there a start filing these UCC’s.
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards and claiming my rights as a free man does not breach the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas without security interest, the State has NO RIGHTS/authority against you, because it has no equitable title to your property, as you're in the PRIVATE, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to license, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that all jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court.” Pipe Line v. Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22.Whereas it is my understanding that “People of a state are entitled to all rights, which formerly belong to the King by his prerogative.” Lansing v Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9,20 (NY).
Whereas it is my understanding that "The state can only tax and regulate something it creates". Ward v. Maryland 12 Wallace 418, and it did not create me, and,
Whereas “The people are sovereign and not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,…..It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound.” People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825). and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the King ceded his sovereignty to the American people, so they became sovereigns without subjects, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that "The right of expatriation is a natural, inherent, and inalienable right and extends to the Indian as well as to the white race. "United States, ex rel. Standing Bear, v. George Crook. 25 F.Cas. 695 (1879), and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas the STATE OF ALASKA is a corporation operating under the DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION taxpayer’s identification number: 92-6001185, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the court: SUPERIOR COURT ‘FOR’ THE STATE OF ALASKA is a contract court working ‘FOR’ the STATE OF ALASKA under the Department of Administration, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that Alaska court houses are bond trading companies contracted to take money from the birth bonds of ‘PERSONS’ by the use of ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTS created by printing the PERSON’S name in all capital letters to enrich the State Treasury, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that judges invest their pension funds into Corrections Corporation of America, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the reason my case number 3AN-04-9O8O-CI was allowed to continue more than eleven years was for the purpose of taking millions of dollars from my birth bond number: 1214625 that was put upon my birth certificate by state bureaucrats without my consent or knowledge sometime after statehood, and,
Whereas the State of Alaska allowed the dumping of radioactive drill tailing from 200 oil wells between 1060 and the year 2000, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that departments within the State of Alaska allowed two oil tankers a day for more than twenty years to dump billions of gallons of tanker ballast water taken from Los Angeles, Anacortes, Hawaii, Korea, and Japanese boat harbors into Cook Inlet and Kodiak waters, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the ballast water contained trillions of foreign bacteria, algae and nematodes not native to Alaska that altered the plankton blooms making it impossible for the shrimp and crab to survive thereby taking over a billion dollars a year away from the private sector, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that there were eight oil well blowouts in Cook Inlet, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that offshore drilling rigs have pipes that eject toxic pollutants deep under water where the sheen doesn’t show on the surface, and,
Whereas commercial crab fishermen like myself  lost a billion dollars’ worth of boats and gear after the crab and shrimp resource were destroyed, and,
Whereas after the crab and shrimp resources were destroyed many small town processing plants went bankrupt and thousands of cannery workers lost their jobs, and,
Whereas the cities of Homer, Kodiak, Old Harbor and other towns lost their infrastructure and had to depend more on state and federal grants to provide services to their people, and, 
Whereas it is my understanding that DNR allow this to happen to eliminate the inshore fishing fleet so that they could sell billions of dollars of oil leases in lower Cook Inlet down Shelikoff Strait, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that as it turned out there is little or no oil in the area, and,    
Whereas it is my understanding that all processes in the cited CASE NO: 3KN-11-00695CI, have been summary processed in which the Constitutional and commercial right to jury trial has been abridged and denied and all other supporting processes have likewise been summary processed, and,
Whereas I was informed by the alleged judge of the alleged court that I could appeal if I did not like his decision, and given that I am age 71 the alleged judge has a sadistic sense of humor, and,
Whereas I read the conclusion of twenty of the recent Supreme Court cases and not one of them reversed the decision of the Superior Court, and,
Whereas my chances of prevailing in on appeal are less than 5%, the reason being that the Court Clerk would have to return the money taken from the bounds and given to the state, and,
Whereas it is my understating that this entire case constitutes multiple fraud violations including the failure to acknowledge the July 26th 2014 BLM survey as proof that there is no case, and,
Whereas is it my understanding that the BAR association is a foreign corporation based in England, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that ‘BAR’ stands for British Accredited Registry, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that all officers of the court sworn to uphold BAR rules and are acting as foreign agents on American soil, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that BAR members are foreign agents committing TREASON on American soil and the penalty for treason is death, and,
Whereas thousands of counts of fraud have been perpetrated against the people of Alaska depriving them of life, liberty and property worth many billions of dollars, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that administrative rulings by fraudulent contract courts are totally lacking in validity and jurisdiction having no effect whatever on sovereign citizens, and
Whereas common law is still in effect in America and USE of Federal Reserve Notes to make purchases, CREATES tax liability, while the SSN officially makes you a taxpayer and provides the gov't with an easy mechanism for collecting that tax. Which is why a DEMAND for lawful money is a MAJOR step out of the corporate Matrix, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the United States of America,{the land of the free}has more people in jail that Russia and China combined, and,
Whereas a Harvard-UC Berkley study found that the chance of a child escaping the poorest of Americans and land among its richest had increased only 0.6 percent in 15 years while Denmark has twice the chance of an American to escape poverty, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the property that I inhabited for 70 years and used it before Alaska was a state and that I have the right of use and access free of charge and,
Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not
affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation and summons issued by defacto contract courts working for the corporate government create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land in a de-facto contract court, and,
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities ’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right, and,
Furthermore, I claim the right to deed my property to others as I see fit, and,
Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure and not a contract court working for the State of Alaska, and,
Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Alaska are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.
Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both
parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act, and,
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise
regulated and FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.  
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Reponses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service. Whereas if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time it shall remain in force forever, and,

Whereas I hereby present a bill: §1205. Bill in equity by injured person to the State of Alaska.
"1. Injunctive relief; damages and costs.  Any person damaged or who is threatened with loss or injury by reason of a violation or threatened violation of this chapter may bring a civil action in the Superior Court in the county where he resides, to prevent, restrain or enjoin such violation or threatened violation. If in such action a violation or threatened violation of this chapter shall be established, the court may enjoin and restrain or otherwise prohibit such violation or threatened violation. In such action it shall not be necessary that actual damages to the plaintiff be alleged or proved. In addition to such injunctive relief, the plaintiff in said action shall be entitled to recover from the defendant 3 times the amount of actual damages by him sustained and the costs of the action including reasonable attorneys' fees."
Whereas  2. Equity SUPERSEDES codes if you have a valid claim. So if you pay with green paper you are NOT entitled to Equity. However when I bought the Kroll homestead land from Del and Nancy Alsop, I paid them 40-one-ounce gold krugerrands when gold was worth $990 and ounce.  I mentioned this fact earlier in my un-rebutted affidavits.” I paid Dell Alsop REAL gold and I AM entitled to make a claim in Equity.  And,
Whereas I also make a PROPERTY CLAIM.  CLAIM: A claim is a challenge of the ownership of a thing which a man has not in possession, and is wrongfully withheld by another. Plowd. 359; Wee i Dall.444; 12 S. & R. 179.  __ 1856 Bouvier's Law Dictionary. Whereas  until 1933 we had REAL gold and silver money and REAL common law, which was divided into AT LAW (criminal) and EQUITY (civil) jurisdictions. But since in 1933 the United States went bankrupt, took all the people’s gold and replaced real money with green paper, people no longer have REAL ownership, and all property ownership is presumed to be in the State, because you CAN'T acquire FULL ownership rights, when you pay for things with PAPER notes.
Whereas the ownership of property is split into the EQUITABLE title which belongs to the State, and the LEGAL title which YOU get. And the equitable title gives the State the right to REGULATE 'your' property, while the legal title gives you the right to POSSESS and USE that property, subject to State regulation, and,
Whereas if we still had REAL gold money in circulation, people would get a FULL, LAWFUL title to their property, which would NOT be subject to State regulation, except when used in commerce, like for example using a boat or auto for BUSINESS purposes, and,
Whereas after 1933 people no longer had FULL property rights, the At Law and Equity jurisdictions were replaced by a STATUTORY jurisdiction, since in absence of real money and lawful titles, everyone's subject to State codes and statutes. In other words, ONLY people with FULL property rights are entitled to make a CLAIM under Equity, while everyone else is subject to codes and statutes. However since we the people are forced to us the fiat paper currency we can claim Equity, and,
Whereas the people of this nation were turned into bonded slaves to back the fiat currency by the bond numbers put on their birth certificates at birth, and,
Whereas when people are killed during a military conflict the generals and the press refer to them as collateral damage, and,
Whereas what is SPECIAL about Equity, is that it SUPERSEDES codes and statutes.  If you pay with REAL gold or silver or with your labor then you WOULD be entitled to make a claim in Equity, and,
Whereas Equity is for anyone who was damaged, is threatened to be damaged, or has a CLAIM which means that it also could be used as a COUNTER-CLAIM, against anyone trying to restrict use of your property (which you bought with lawful money) such as a car, or when that car was impounded. In this case we use the land and items taken in COMMERCE!
Whereas the only duty of any Government is to secure and protect property. Please restore my property. “Truth Has No Agenda!”
Whereas the land is question is shown as tideland on all State and Federal plats, and,
Whereas Ninilchik Natives Association can’t claim tideland. In fact they had to lease tideland from the State of Alaska DNR 3/4 of a mile west of the sand spit to construct a temporary dock to export wood chips, and,
Whereas the present owners of the homestead cannot claim the sand spit because it is tideland lying outside the boundaries of United States Survey 4684.
Whereas I have many decades of sweat equity building cabins and the boats we use in our set-net fishery. I have sweat equity in constructing our 3,600 square foot home plus the hanging and mending our fish nets, boats and gear.
Whereas I am a sovereign “ON” the land USING IT IN COMMERCE with a valid claim to it before Alaska was a state.

The cited Lien Debtors will be lined for a minimum of $22,857,000.00 each, based on Title 18, Section 241, of the United States Code for violation of United States Constitutional Rights including the Seventh Amendment of the Bill of Rights, guaranteeing a jury trial in all commercial processes and approximately 35 other commercial provisions of the United States Constitution.


             - BILL IN EQUITY –
Pertaining to the Public Fraud, Law, Money and Commercial Liens:
To Whom These Presents Shall Come; Greetings; Take Notice: I HEREBY DEMAND COMPENSATION FOR THE FOLLOWING LOSSES INCURRED DUE TO CORRPUTION FRAUD AND MISMANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC RESOURCES AND THE LOSSES INCURRED DUE TO THE FRIVOLOUUS LAWSUIT: NO. 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL. Claimants are allowed to claim four times their actual losses.

1.      My Attorney costs for this frivolous lawsuit: $ 135,980.
2.      The destruction of the crab fishery with tanker ballast water: $2,000,000.
3.      My brother’s life: No amount of money can repay me for that.
4.      My Daughter’s life: No amount of money can repay me for that.
5.      The cost of my bankruptcy due to the destruction of the crab fisheries: $900,000.
6.      Loss of my 72-foot boat, Mary M after the state allowed the destruction of the shrimp and crab fisheries: today’s boat prices: $1,950,000.
7.      Loss of 200 crab pots: $ 150,000.
8.      Loss of our home, warehouse and deep water mooring in Halibut Cove $600,000.
9.      Loss of Tuxedni Bay homestead after I paid off the State mortgage $1,000,000.
10.  Loss of the herring fishery due to oil spills. $2,000,000.
11.  Loss of my process ship Orion: $6,950,000 after a state company stole my business plan.
12.  Loss of the halibut fishery given away to the Federal Corporation by Governor, Tony Knowles for political gain: $1,000,000.
13.  Loss of the shrimp & clams due to tanker ballast & oil well blowouts: $100,000.  
14.  Health related problems due to divorce, suffering, worry and stress: $334,020.
15.  Loss due declining value and forced sale of our Seldovia property. $150,000. (EXHIBIT 13 B.)
16.  Lost fishing time for having to appear in court: $20,000.
17.  Our skiffs and outboards are worth $30,000.
18.  Twelve nets are worth a total of $10,600.00 with anchors buoys and lines.
19.  I paid $10,000 for my Polaris six wheeler in Tuxedni Bay.
20.  The 20 by 20-foot cabin on the Home point $20,000.
21.  10 by 12-foot cabin 100 yards west of home $8,000.
22.  8 by 8-foot cabin on the end of the sand spit $4,000.
23.  8 by 8-foot sauna cabin $4,000.
24.  8 BY 8-foot heavy timber, cellar with cement foundation $4,000. 
25.  8 by 8-foot generator shed $2,000.
26.  Machine shop tools including my 16-inch swing metal lathe plus all the accessory tools, welder, planer, table saw etc. $20,000.
27.  Loss of my 13 by 24-foot upstairs apartment $ 8,000.
28.  Our annual salmon catch of $50,000.00 for the next ten years $500,000.
29.  The loss of our future subsistence hunting and fishing rights. $500,000.
30.  Lost time, stress and aggravation over the last eleven years $110,000.
31.  The money taken out of HENRY KROLL CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL during the last eleven years. $4,000,000.
       
Total owed AFFIANT: $22,857,000.00 jointly and severally. Please be advised that the lien claimant of a non-judicial commercial lien is entitled to three times the actual loss. A commercial lien will be recorded and UCC1 within 20 days.

Whereas it is mandated in The Constitution of the State of Alaska SECTION 18. EMINENT DOMAIN: Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation. If the SUPERIOR COURT cannot abide with the Alaska Constitution in Case No. 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL then it is not a COURT.
Whereas the lawsuit was a violation of our families’ First Amendment Animist religious beliefs. As a Native Alaskans born in Alaska we have to work with nature and become a part of it to survive. Destroying our means to earn a living, taking our fishing gear, private property and forcing us to live in poverty without just compensation is genocide.
Whereas Defendants were made to suffer numerous TORTS forcing us to attending unlawful administrative hearings, use credit cards to pay lawyers and other TORTS described in my 15 un-rebutted AFFIDAVITS filed with this court in alleged CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL to defend our subsistence hunting and fishing rights, our right to earn a living and our way of life. The only duty of any government is to secure and protect property, and,
Whereas Officers of the Court dis not uphold their oaths they are in Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Please restore my property.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land.
Place of claim of right to use: sand spit / tideland south of US 4685 north shore Tuxedni Bay, Alaska North American Union ~ One World Order.
Furthermore I claim the right to file and enforce a COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST those parties
who stole property from me and my family under color of law using CONSTUCTIVE TRUST administrative rulings in a contract court. Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, _______________________________________ a Freeman-on the- Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .

Constructive Notice of Child of God Status:
Whereas Alaska is a territory claimed and founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and,
Whereas the number two position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and,
Whereas the governments of this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and,
Whereas I am desirous of living my life as a 'Child of God,' and,
Whereas the only powers able to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and,
Whereas neither the government, nor its agents nor its representatives or employees are God, or above God, and,
Whereas by legally claiming the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,
Be it known to any and all, that on this date,

_________________________________I,________________________________________a free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'.

Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God. Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful. Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and /or extortion.

Defendants were made to suffer TORTS forcing us to attending unlawful administrative hearings, use credit cards to pay lawyers and other TORTS described in my 15 un-rebutted AFFIDAVITS filed with this court in alleged CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL to defend our subsistence hunting and fishing rights, our right to earn a living and our way of life. The only duty of any government is to secure and protect property. If Officers of the Court don’t uphold their oaths they are in Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Please restore my property.


I, Henry-Frederick: Kroll, hereby verify that this AFFIDAVIT NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT  is true and correct, according to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God. A real court of LAW must proceed under Oath of Office and in truth.


Notice to Principal is Notice to agent and Notice to agent is Notice to Principal.
Dated this____day of FEBRUARY 2015


Respectfully signed:                                                                                                           Sui Juris 
By authorized representative, HENRY KROLL 
                                    Without prejudice, UCC 1-207 & UCC 1-308

                                                     Jurat

Subscribed and sworn to at____________, before me this___day of February, 2015

Notary Public_____________________________

My Commission Expires____________________

My hand and official seal_____________________









CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Henry Kroll do hereby swear and declare that I have served by the United States Mail, a copy of this NOTICE OF UUDERSTANDING  INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT BILL IN EQUITY by US mail to the respondents listed below.

Dated February____, 2015                                                              

By authorized representative, Henry-Frederick for HENRY KROLL      

                                              
Alaska Superior Court               Andrew R. Naylor                       
825 West 4th Avenue                 1031 W. 4th Ave, Ste. 200            
Anchorage, Alaska 99501          Anchorage, Alaska 99501         

BRIAN DUFFY Ninilchik Native Association Inc.                      Calvin Jones
1029 W. 3rd Ave., Ste. 510                                                         PO Box 241921
Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 258-9053                            Anchorage, Alaska 99524

            Marla Greenstein                                               Jeremy Provencio and Caroline Kroll
            510 L Street, Suite 585                                       PO Box 222211
            Anchorage, Alaska 99501                                  Anchorage, Alaska 99501

            Adam Smith                                                      Senator Don Young
State of Alaska DNR                                        Governor Bill Walker
550 W. 5th Ave., Suite 900 C                              Mark Begich
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3577                          Senator Dan Sullivan

State of Alaska Department of Administration
P.O. Box 110204

Juneau, Alaska 99811-0204corruption

Saturday, February 28, 2015

YOU ARE WORTH MILLIONS: YOUR BIRTH BOND...

JUDGES INVEST THEIR PENSIONS IN CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA. THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE IN JAIL IN AMERICA THAN RUSSIA AND CHINA COMBINED AND AMERICA HAS LESS THAN 1/2 THE POPULATION OF THOSE TWO COUNTRIES..

About the Birth Certificate
Here's a bit more about the Birth Certificate. The way I overstand it, is that when your parents sign up for it, you get a Birth Certificate, which gives you certain RIGHTS to gov't benefits. And that's in return for you depositing your SOVEREIGNTY with the federal gov't. You see, American people are sovereign, and as such they're not liable for the national debt or income taxes, and the gov't needs someone to back up their fiat 'money' scheme and spending, without them being responsible for it.
So the Birth Certificate is kinda like a Certificate of Deposit, that you get when you sign up for a CD for a certain period of time, and in return the bank agrees to give you BENEFITS, which usually is a certain rate of interest that they pay you.
So the original BC application is a CONTRACT, which gives the benefit provider a RIGHT to proceeds from the State taxing and licensing you. So there basically is YOU the depositor, and the OWNER of the original BC contract.
It is a lot like issuing stocks, where the company sells stock, which gives the buyer EQUITY in the company, which entitles him to dividents, or in case of bonds, to guaranteed interest after maturity. And what holder in due course of the original BC/contract gets, is EQUITY in all your property, as well as a right to tax your income. Which is why the United States uses these BC contracts as COLLATERAL behind its US Treasuries and other securities, including Federal Reserve Notes. I.e. the State becomes the EQUITABLE owner of all your property, and so it gets to DICTATE how that property can be used, and what kind of fees you gotta pay for using that property. So as a corporate US citizen, you only get a LEGAL title to your property, which is a privilege subject to regulation.
In other words, without Birth Certificates, there'd be no corporate Democracy because the gov't COULDN'T print fiat money FRNs, because the Federal Reserve wouldn't issue FRNs, as US would have no collateral to back its borrowing, because all the American people would stay in the PRIVATE, where they're NOT liable for the US national debt and income tax.
So I hope you see that having a BC makes you a surety for the national debt, and your property a COLLATERAL for that debt. Makes you a subject of the federal gov't, including the IRS. And as the depositor, you have rights not only to gov't benefits, but also to FULL DISCLOSURE, as well as disclosure of who is the registered owner of your BC deposit, the holder in due course, and disclosure of the authority that gov't agencies claim when they demand you to pay or perform according to their demands. I.e., what is the instrument or agreement by which I consented to obey your rules?
And here's what Jean Keating says about it:
"When your parents signed the birth certificate, they created a legal fiction called a straw man. . In commercial law its called a (homus straus?), which is a legal fiction or straw man. First the State registered it with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept. of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC (Depository Trust Company).
This company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and settlement company. The DTC it’s nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE and company. That’s the nominee. As in when they ceded the State of Maryland to the District of Colombia.
All your money goes through this company (DTC). This is the clearing corporation, clearing house and settlement depository for all commodities and securities. All commodities and securities are registered with CEDE and Co. under rule 12. Everybody is reading the UCC.  You should be reading SEC. Alpine publishing in NYC they have the national securities and exchange act of 1934.  There are two of them one in 1933, and one in 1934. Two different acts.  You should be studying these rules. Because what they're doing under rule 12, is they are registering your birth certificate. – Under rule 12 as a security.  They register this in the name of CEDE and Co. There are two types of securities. Certificated and un-certificated.  What they do is issue a certificate. Isn’t that what it says on your birth (certificate of live birth)? When they register it they issue a certificate, it becomes a certificated security. And it’s registered in the name of CEDE and Co.   What does that make them?  It makes them the registered holder. This has nothing to do with debtor/creditor law.
You own everything and you don’t control anything.  They control everything why? Because they are the registered owner. – of the certificated security (birth certificate) and they use this as collateral. You have to know what is going on before you go in there a start filing these UCC’s.
So, these people are the registered owners. Your are the owner in fact.  The registered owners control everything. They don’t own anything but they control everything. The people that are running this county control everything because they are the registered holder - owner of all these instruments - commercial paper.  You don’t control anything. I found all this out when I started studying the Erie vs Tompkins case decided in 1938 by Louis Brandis. This is what happened in 1938 that changed our country. The most important decision handed down by the US Supreme Court.  It’s not the real US Supreme Court – it is the High Court of Admiralty. Its called the high court of Justice, and you look up the word high court of Justice, you will find out its the high court of Admiralty. The real Supreme Court is the United States District Court for the District of Colombia in Washington, DC. They moved all the justices out of that court up on to the Capitol Hill in 1948.  If you go into the United States District Court for the District of Colombia, you will not find a yellow-fringed US flag in any of the courtrooms.  We went down there and looked.  Howard Griswald and I did.
That is your real article 3-section one court set up under the constitution. It was called the circuit court of the United States of the District of Colombia before it was called the Supreme Court in the United States for the District of Colombia.  They did that in march 3 1863.  They changed the name to the Supreme Court of the United States of the District of Colombia.  That is your real article 3 Supreme Court. That court setting up on Capitol Hill is your high court of justice, or your admiralty maritime court.   Nobody uses it – everybody goes into the territorial courts under article 1.
So they control everything because they are the registered holder – registered owner of the certificated security. Your birth certificate is a security.   On the screen is UCC Under definitions, it says a financial asset, except as otherwise provided under section 8-103, means a security.  What is a security? A security is an obligation of a person or a share, participation or other interest in a person or a property or an enterprise of a person which is, or is of a type dealt in or traded on a financial market.
Aren’t certificates traded in the market?  And this company (DTC) – CEDE and Co.- that’s its nominee, which means name, all your securities and commodities are registered in this company right here. They are the registered holder and registered owner of your birth certificate.
You are underwriting the public and national debt.  Because everybody on the public is, bankrupt.  They put HJR 192 in title 31 section 5118 2D.  “No contract shall contain an obligation which purports to give the obligee the right to demand payment in any kind of specific coin or currency of the United States.  They outlawed money. They did this under the War Powers Act.
How can there be a debt when there is no money.
June 4, 1933 they codified HJR 190 in title 31, sec 5118. (Banking Code)   under the War Powers Act.  There was no legal authority for doing this. Franklin Roosevelt sold more gold contracts than there was gold. They were going to run on the Treasury so he had to put a stop to it. And he declared a national emergency thru the Emergency Bank Act of arch 9, 1933. It’s in the Congressional Record- I am not making this up.  In 1970, they took 3 billion dollars out of Social Security to cover the British Treasury Department – they were going broke because all these corporations under GAT was converting all their dollars to euros, and they made a run on the British Treasury, and they didn’t have any currency, so they stole 3 billion dollars out of Social Security. They did this in 1970 under the Marshal Plan. One congressman was investigating it and they murdered him. This officially outlawed money (CFR31-5118).  When you sign a promissory note, it says you will pay back in US dollars. That’s why they indorse it on the back – to make it legal – it then is no longer a promissory note, it is an order to pay.  When you sign a mortgage, it is a financial agreement conveying your property to them – it is fraud, void. Then they sell it on the open market.
They track these with a CUSIP (committee on uniform security identification process) number. (9-digit number – the first 6 digits identifies what security it is. This is how they track you – that and trough your AUTOTRIS).
CUSIP is located on Water Street in DC in the DTC building.  They have another called ISIP (international securities identification process) in the ISID International Securities Identification directory."
************************************
So you're still the rightful OWNER of your sovereignty that you 'deposited' with the State, but CAN'T USE IT, just like you can't use the money that you deposited with a bank in return for Certificates of Deposit. And in order to get back your sovereign status, you'd have to basically return to them the Birth Certificate, maybe with an affidavit stating that it's the only BC that you have, and tell them that you cancel their trusteeship which was created by the original application for the BC.
And of course when you return the only copy of the BC that you have, you no longer can access gov't benefits. And if you are no longer eligible for gov't benefits, then the trust no longer exists, because without gov't benefits, the State did NOT give any value, so it has no rights/authority over you.

That's UCC for you; unless one gives VALUE, security interest does NOT attach. And without security interest, the State has NO RIGHTS/authority against you, because it has no equitable title to your property, as you're in the PRIVATE.

Friday, June 22, 2012

SUE THE IRS TO COLLECT WHAT IS DUE...


From: Legalbear
Reply-To: "tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com"
Date: Sunday, June 3, 2012 6:19 PM
To: "tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com"
Subject: [tips_and_tricks] Giving the IRS an Attitude Adjustment




After § 7433 Suit Filed, IRS Attitude Changes for the Better:


I’m kind of excited. I just got word of what appeared to be a total change of heart by the IRS after receiving a final notice of intent to sue followed by the actual filing of a suit under 26 U.S.C. § 7433. 


The IRS had made this couple promises and was not keeping them. When the couple started taking the IRS to task for not keeping the promises they gave them still more runaround. This is such a typical story that I hear all the time.


The couple had already sent a notice of intent to sue based on § 7433. But, when the couple sent a final warning that they intended to file suit and then actually did file the suit, the IRS had change of heart and became kinder and more gentle. They began to leave polite messages on the voice mail and seemed to become very sincere about correcting the errors. It appeared that they were concerned that their actions had resulted in the suit being filed and inquired about the status of the suit. 


Beneficial Features of Section 7433:


As you may recall, 26 U.S.C. § 7433(a) provides: 


If, in connection with any collection of Federal tax with respect to a taxpayer, any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of this title, or any regulation promulgated under this title, such taxpayer[1] may bring a civil action for damages against the United States in a district court of the United States.


But, subsection (d) provides limitations:




(1) A judgment for damages shall not be awarded under subsection (b) unless the court determines that the plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedies…


As some of you know, I’ve been a proponent of using the exhaustion requirement to our advantage. 26 CFR 301.7433-1(e) provides: 


An administrative claim…shall be sent in writing to the Area Director, Attn: Compliance Technical Support Manager of the area in which the taxpayer currently resides.


Administrative Claim Letter Success:


Letters sent in compliance with this provision have met with some success. 


In all, I am aware of seven instances where levees were released after one of these letters was sent. 


I had always said that there was a possibility that somebody would get a check as a result of these letters. A while back that actually happened. Somebody combined my lien and levy research in their letter and got a check back for over $6000 of wrongfully levied funds from the IRS.


Government Does Not Want More Litigation:


I recently got some additional insight as to the distastefulness of litigation to the government when I read the book The Price of Loyalty by Ron Suskind, Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2004. The book is about Paul O’Neill’s 1.5 year stint as Secretary of the Treasury. He was trying to make some changes in the ways that executives of corporations were treated. The results will become self-evident as you read:


On page 225:


Shifting the standard to negligence is a huge problem, the SEC chairman said. We just can’t go there. There’s no doubt that we have to prevent gaming the system. But we need a high standard, otherwise we’ll be overwhelmed with litigation.


On page 230:


Three days later, a story ran in the Wall Street Journal about O’Neill’s position on corporate governance and his desire to lift the standard from recklessness to simple negligence. It mentioned that Pitt and Hubbard were against the new standard, “concerned that no matter how it was crafted it will lead to more lawsuits.”


At page 233:


Many of the CEOs seemed to have consulted already with their chief counsels. The one thing they didn’t want was even the slightest uptick in litigation.


At page 239:


The move from recklessness to negligence was dropped for fear it would invite a wave of lawsuits. O’Neill and Greenspan were discouraged. A single issue for the corporate crowd—fear of lawsuits—carried the day, O’Neill said, his outrage boiling over.


So, big corporations and big government, with all of their attorneys and resources, as I suspected, do not want more litigation. An administrative claim for damages, or notice of intent to sue, gives us an opportunity to take advantage of the government’s distaste for litigation. 


Success after the Suit has been Filed:


There have been reports of no results from administrative claim letters, but, after hearing about the results described in the first paragraph of this e-mail, it got me to thinking about the results I found in the case law after the suit was filed; for example: 


1) Mrs. Shaw received a refund of all the money collected, and the remaining tax liability was abated.  Shaw v. U.S., Fifth Circuit.  


2) After filing one of these suits, the government dismissed the criminal action against the 7433 plaintiff.  Fishburn v. Brown, Sixth Circuit, 1997.  


3) After filing one of these suits, the IRS returned a seized Cadillac.  Washington v. U.S., Ninth Circuit, 1992.  FE


4) After filing one of these suits, the plaintiff's tax liability "was resolved in the plaintiff's favor in tax court.  Templeman v. U.S., First Circuit, 1994.  


5) After filing one of these suits, an injunction restricting state court filings was vacated.  Templeman v. U.S., First Circuit, 1994. 


6) After filing one of these suits, improperly levied funds were returned.  Raymond v. U.S., Sixth Circuit, 1993. 


7) After filing one of these suits, the government conceded that an assessment was erroneous and released its liens.  Miller v. U.S. (N.D. Cal. 1992). 


8) The government provided the forms during the litigation that they had previously refused to. Ball v. U.S., No. 94-2125 (7th Cir. 1995). 




It Is Possible to Win Damages off a Section 7433 Suit:


Let’s not forget the 5th Circuit case Gandy Nursery v. U.S. where $388,500 in damages were awarded and $317,738.50 in costs and attorney's fees; plus, post-judgment interest on the $16,800.   


Some Suggestions for Those Dealing With IRS:


If you already sent your claim letter:


26 CFR 301.7433-1(d) provides that, “…no action under paragraph (a) of this section shall be maintained in any federal district court before the earlier of the following dates: (i) The date the decision is rendered on a claim filed in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section; or (ii) The date six months after the date an administrative claim is filed…”


If you had a decision on your administrative claim letter, you can go ahead and file your suit, or, you can do like the couple in the first paragraph and send them a warning letter.


If you send an administrative claim letter and less than six months has passed you may want to send a warning letter telling them that the six month deadline is approaching; and that they may want to take action.


If you send an administrative claim letter and more than six months has passed you have the option of sending the warning letter or filing suit.


If you have one of my packages, but have not sent a section 7433 letter:


You may want to go into my package and locate the file 26USC7433. If you need to search your hard drive you should quickly find the file if you search for exactly this: 26USC7433. Once you locate it you should review the notes files and the sample letters. You should also review the statute and the regulation which are here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7433


and here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/301.7433-1


I’m sure these have changed since you bought my package. Locate some statutes and regulations that the IRS violated and you will be ready to put together your letter. I am available to review letters; if you would like that please call me: 720 -675 -7230 9:00 AM to 8:30 PM MST. 


If you do not have one of my packages, but think it would benefit you to send an administrative claim letter: 


My research packages amount to what I call a “shortcut to competence”. If you follow the statute and the regulation there is somebody on the other end that is going to be reading your letter. Because of this, you want your letter to display a certain degree of competence. It must appear in your letter that you’ve done your homework. A competent letter is the shortest route to success; and may save you from having to file suit. If you go to my shopping cart here:


http://www.legalbears.com/armor/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=4&products_id=47


You’ll see you will see THE BIGGEST PACKAGE! THE BIGGEST SAVINGS! This package includes Lien & Levy Thumper-IRS Terminator for CDPH-All Angles Offensive MP3’s-Frivolous Return Penalties Research-Bear’s Online Legal Research Video & Golden FOIAs. This package is normally $577. For the next 10 days (June 13) when you enter IRSAttitudeAdjustment during the checkout process you will save $200 and be able to get the package for just $377. That’s a $1213 savings over what you would pay for these packages separately!


I’m convinced that filing one of these letters, sending a warning letter, and filing suit is one of the quickest and most effective ways of getting some respect from the IRS.


Knowing what your rights are is the first step to getting them: 


When the IRS violates our due process rights, most people feel bad. The bad feeling is what tells you that your rights have been violated. However, the bad feeling should only be the trigger that sets in motion a search for the authority, usually from the Supreme Court, establishing the right and explaining it. Understanding this concept is what set me on a search for Supreme Court decisions explaining due process rights. I copied and pasted 34 pages of due process quotes from the Supreme Court with the citations to the cases and quotes and put them here:


http://www.legalbears.com/armor/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=4&products_id=49


If the IRS agent fails to give you all your constitutional rights he could lose his job. I made a video about this and you can view it at the link above. I call this package HOW TO HOLD IRS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS over THEIR HEAD. This is a tremendous lever to use against IRS personnel, the threat of the loss of their job. Normally I sell this package for $200. Through June 13th, when you enter DueProcessViolations in the coupon code blank on check out you will save $100 and be able to buy these quotes for $100; a 50% savings!


NOTE: If you would like to get both of these packages you must make separate purchases because the shopping cart will only accept one discount code at a time.


I hope this email has been some help to you and given you some hope. Bear


Call me at: 720-675-7230


On Skype: legalbear


Best times to call: 8:30 am to 9:00 pm MST


Join my Yahoo Group Tips & Tricks for Court by sending an email to:


tips_and_tricks-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


My blog: legalbearsblog.com 


Tax sites: IRSTerminator.com IRSLienThumper.com IRSLevyThumper.com 


(formatted like this so this email doesn't end up in your spam folder)


[1] The Supreme Court has held that there are two kinds of taxpayers: 1) the taxpayer from whom the tax is sought to be collected; 2) the taxpayer that is subject to the Internal Revenue Code. The court held that a non-taxpayer could not be deprived of remedies under the Code by virtue of that status.