COMMON LOW IS THE LAW OF THE CONTINENTAL REPUBLIC. Each time the ice caps disappears. The DNA of surface creatures is altered.
Saturday, February 28, 2015
COMMON LAW IS STILL HERE
COMMON
LAW STILL HERE
This
is from Angela's talk show in April, with Al Barcroft. I'm posting it because
he shows what the difference is between private and public law and how to use
claim of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD, to get rid of the SSN. But he's wrong that common
law was eliminated. It was only SUPPRESSED. If it was eliminated, that'd mean
that public law was eliminated and we only have private law. And that's not
true, it's just that corporate US citizens are subject to private law, and if
you want to access public law, you've got to have a valid reason to rebut the
presumption that you're a US citizen subject or a user of their gov't benefits,
including the FRNs. Here's the first part and the Wikipedia US Code page that
shows what is positive law and what is private law.
Private
vs Public law, and beginning of Social Security (18min.):
AlBarcroft1b.mp3
Constructive Fraud and SSN (18min.):
AlBarcroft1c.mp3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Code
Or
as Karl Lentz does, use a DIFFERENT VENUE to access the court system. But about
that later. So Al has a NARROW understanding of the law, as he showed when Karl
Lentz called, and Al refused to talk to him and called him a jerk.
The
second thing to note from this is how decades ago Al went to pay the IRS with a
$100 Grand cashiers check, and they refused it and kicked him out, because it
was AFTER he got rid of his SSN. That shows you that the SSN is what makes you
a taxpayer, so obviously then, without it, you don't owe any income tax, as Al
says.
In
other words, the SSN is a MEMBERSHIP # for corporate Democracy. If you got it, you're
eligible for various gov't benefits, including welfare, unemployment and
licenses, but also liable to pay taxes, since someone has to pay for those
benefits. And of course FRNs are another benefit of the corporate State which
has to be paid for, which is why they make it so hard for people to opt out of
Social Security, because they hold you tax liable for the ND, and having an SSN
is the best way to make you pay your share for using FRN debt notes.
Remember,
what came first, was replacement of honest gold money with FRN debt notes in
1933, so OBVIOUSLY the Social Security that came in 1935 was a way to get
everyone ENUMERATED with a TAX NUMBER so they could tax your use of FRNs, which
they call INCOME. So issuing Social Security numbers to everyone, which now is
done by DEFAULT at birth, is a way of collecting interest on the money Congress
borrows from Federal Reserve, which is the NATIONAL DEBT (ND).
And
of course the bigger the ND is, the more money they have to collect in taxes to
service it, and pay the interest on it, and they do it by passing MORE LAWS in
order to generate more revenue. Like I said before, the larger the national
debt, the FEWER freedoms we have.
So
FRNs issued into circulation is the CAUSE of tax liability, and the SSNs are
the MEANS of collecting tax revenue in order to pay for the national debt
(FRNs).
In
other words, your USE of FRNs to make purchases, CREATES tax liability, while
the SSN officially makes you a taxpayer and provides the gov't with an easy
mechanism for collecting that tax. Which is why a DEMAND for lawful money is a
MAJOR step out of the corporate Matrix, since voluntary use of FRNs is the
CAUSE of corporate Democracy.
And
while Al compares Costco membership with the SSN as being a membership card in the
federal Democracy, demanding lawful money then would be like having Costco
membership, but NOT BUYING anything. And if you don't buy anything at Costco,
their rules DON'T APPLY to you, since you didn't get anything from them.
IRS
refusal of payment (5min.):
AlBarcroft2.mp3
STATE CITIZENS ARE SOVERIGN
STATE CITIZENS ARE SOVEREIGN
And the reason why State Citizens are NOT also US (federal) citizens, is because State Citizens are members of the dejure Republic, while federal US citizens are members of corporate Democracy, and ONLY corporate US citizens are ELIGIBLE for gov't benefits. State Citizens AREN'T.
And who is eligible? State RESIDENTS. So OBVIOUSLY, if you're a State resident, you CAN'T be a State Citizen, who's the only one that's entitled to protection of the ORGANIC US and State Constitution.
“It is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to license. All jurisdictional facts supporting claim that supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court.” Pipe Line v. Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22.
“It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and the federal government, through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign within their respective states.” Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997.
Here's the 'SMOKING GUN". People, you're trading your sovereignty for federal BENEFITS!
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
"The technical niceties of the common law are not regarded. . . .", 1 R.C.L. 31, p. 422. "A jury does not figure, ordinarily, in the trial of an admiralty suit. . . the verdict of the jury merely advisory, and may be disregarded by the court." 1 R.C.L. 40, p. 432. "[The] rules of practice may be altered whenever found to be inconvenient or likely to embarrass the business of the court." 1 R.C.L. 32, p. 423. "A court of admiralty. . . acts upon equitable principles." 1 R.C.L. 17, p. 416. "A libel of information [accusation] does not require all the technical precision of an indictment at common law. If the allegations describe the offense, it is all that is necessary; and if it is founded upon a statute, it is sufficient if it pursues the words of the law." The Emily v. The Caroline, 9 Wheat. 381
“...it is evident that they [US citizens] have not the political rights which are vested in citizens of the States. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens. They are subject to the laws of the United States, but have no voice in its management. If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of a Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political rights of citizens they cannot enjoy…” People v. De La Guerra,40 Cal. 311, 342 (A.D. 1870) [emphasis added]
“People of a state are entitled to all rights, which formerly belong to the King by his prerogative.” Lansing v Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9,20 (NY).
Problem is that US citizens are NOT people of a State.
The United States Supreme Court quite thoroughly expanded on the two classes
of citizenship in the case Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, where it said:
"...that there was a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of the states, which were distinct from each other, depending upon different characteristics and circumstances in the individual; that it was only privileges and immunities of the citizens of the United States that were placed by the amendment under the protection of the Federal Constitution, and that the privileges and immunities of a citizen of a state, whatever they might be, were not intended to have any additional protection by the paragraph in question, but they must rest for their security and protection where they have heretofore rested."
Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 451;
"The state can only tax and regulate something it creates". Ward v. Maryland 12 Wallace 418
"The right of trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment (Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U. S. 90), and the right to bear arms, guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment (Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252), have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment against abridgement by the states, and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment (Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516), and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment." West v. Louisiana, 194 U. S. 258.
“The people or sovereign are not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,…..It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound.” People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)
The King ceded his sovereignty to the American people, so they became sovereigns without subjects.
"The right of expatriation is a natural, inherent, and inalienable right and extends to the Indian as well as to the white race."United States, ex rel. Standing Bear, v. George Crook. 25 F.Cas. 695 (1879).
"...it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States. ..... A citizen of any one of the States of the Union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing." Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep. 300
That was true until 1868 and the 14th Amendment which created a FEDERAL US citizenship. So since 1868 there are the original American/State Citizens, and FEDERAL (as in District of Columbia) 14th Am. US citizens, both of which exist in one nation, the USA.
"It is not the function of our government to keep the Citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the Citizen to keep the government from falling into error."
American Communications Ass'n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442
YOU ARE WORTH MILLIONS: YOUR BIRTH BOND...
JUDGES INVEST THEIR PENSIONS IN CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA. THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE IN JAIL IN AMERICA THAN RUSSIA AND CHINA COMBINED AND AMERICA HAS LESS THAN 1/2 THE POPULATION OF THOSE TWO COUNTRIES..
About the Birth Certificate
Here's a bit more about the Birth Certificate. The way I
overstand it, is that when your parents sign up for it, you get a Birth
Certificate, which gives you certain RIGHTS to gov't benefits. And that's in
return for you depositing your SOVEREIGNTY with the federal gov't. You see,
American people are sovereign, and as such they're not liable for the national
debt or income taxes, and the gov't needs someone to back up their fiat 'money'
scheme and spending, without them being responsible for it.
So the Birth Certificate is kinda like a Certificate of
Deposit, that you get when you sign up for a CD for a certain period of time,
and in return the bank agrees to give you BENEFITS, which usually is a certain
rate of interest that they pay you.
So the original BC application is a CONTRACT, which gives
the benefit provider a RIGHT to proceeds from the State taxing and licensing
you. So there basically is YOU the depositor, and the OWNER of the original BC
contract.
It is a lot like issuing stocks, where the company sells
stock, which gives the buyer EQUITY in the company, which entitles him to
dividents, or in case of bonds, to guaranteed interest after maturity. And what
holder in due course of the original BC/contract gets, is EQUITY in all your
property, as well as a right to tax your income. Which is why the United States
uses these BC contracts as COLLATERAL behind its US Treasuries and other
securities, including Federal Reserve Notes. I.e. the State becomes the
EQUITABLE owner of all your property, and so it gets to DICTATE how that
property can be used, and what kind of fees you gotta pay for using that
property. So as a corporate US citizen, you only get a LEGAL title to your
property, which is a privilege subject to regulation.
In other words, without Birth Certificates, there'd be no
corporate Democracy because the gov't COULDN'T print fiat money FRNs, because
the Federal Reserve wouldn't issue FRNs, as US would have no collateral to back
its borrowing, because all the American people would stay in the PRIVATE, where
they're NOT liable for the US national debt and income tax.
So I hope you see that having a BC makes you a surety for
the national debt, and your property a COLLATERAL for that debt. Makes you a
subject of the federal gov't, including the IRS. And as the depositor, you have
rights not only to gov't benefits, but also to FULL DISCLOSURE, as well as
disclosure of who is the registered owner of your BC deposit, the holder in due
course, and disclosure of the authority that gov't agencies claim when they
demand you to pay or perform according to their demands. I.e., what is the
instrument or agreement by which I consented to obey your rules?
And here's what Jean Keating says about it:
"When your parents signed the birth certificate, they
created a legal fiction called a straw man. . In commercial law its called a (homus
straus?), which is a legal fiction or straw man. First the State registered it
with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept.
of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC (Depository Trust Company).
This company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and
settlement company. The DTC it’s nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE
and company. That’s the nominee. As in when they ceded the State of Maryland to
the District of Colombia.
All your money goes through this company (DTC). This is the
clearing corporation, clearing house and settlement depository for all
commodities and securities. All commodities and securities are registered with
CEDE and Co. under rule 12. Everybody is reading the UCC. You should be reading SEC. Alpine publishing
in NYC they have the national securities and exchange act of 1934. There are two of them one in 1933, and one in
1934. Two different acts. You should be
studying these rules. Because what they're doing under rule 12, is they are
registering your birth certificate. – Under rule 12 as a security. They register this in the name of CEDE and
Co. There are two types of securities. Certificated and un-certificated. What they do is issue a certificate. Isn’t
that what it says on your birth (certificate of live birth)? When they register
it they issue a certificate, it becomes a certificated security. And it’s
registered in the name of CEDE and Co.
What does that make them? It
makes them the registered holder. This has nothing to do with debtor/creditor
law.
You own everything and you don’t control anything. They control everything why? Because they are
the registered owner. – of the certificated security (birth certificate) and
they use this as collateral. You have to know what is going on before you go in
there a start filing these UCC’s.
So, these people are the registered owners. Your are the
owner in fact. The registered owners
control everything. They don’t own anything but they control everything. The
people that are running this county control everything because they are the
registered holder - owner of all these instruments - commercial paper. You don’t control anything. I found all this
out when I started studying the Erie vs Tompkins case decided in 1938 by Louis
Brandis. This is what happened in 1938 that changed our country. The most
important decision handed down by the US Supreme Court. It’s not the real US Supreme Court – it is
the High Court of Admiralty. Its called the high court of Justice, and you look
up the word high court of Justice, you will find out its the high court of
Admiralty. The real Supreme Court is the United States District Court for the
District of Colombia in Washington, DC. They moved all the justices out of that
court up on to the Capitol Hill in 1948.
If you go into the United States District Court for the District of
Colombia, you will not find a yellow-fringed US flag in any of the
courtrooms. We went down there and
looked. Howard Griswald and I did.
That is your real article 3-section one court set up under
the constitution. It was called the circuit court of the United States of the
District of Colombia before it was called the Supreme Court in the United
States for the District of Colombia.
They did that in march 3 1863.
They changed the name to the Supreme Court of the United States of the
District of Colombia. That is your real
article 3 Supreme Court. That court setting up on Capitol Hill is your high
court of justice, or your admiralty maritime court. Nobody uses it – everybody goes into the
territorial courts under article 1.
So they control everything because they are the registered
holder – registered owner of the certificated security. Your birth certificate
is a security. On the screen is UCC
Under definitions, it says a financial asset, except as otherwise provided
under section 8-103, means a security.
What is a security? A security is an obligation of a person or a share,
participation or other interest in a person or a property or an enterprise of a
person which is, or is of a type dealt in or traded on a financial market.
Aren’t certificates traded in the market? And this company (DTC) – CEDE and Co.- that’s
its nominee, which means name, all your securities and commodities are
registered in this company right here. They are the registered holder and
registered owner of your birth certificate.
You are underwriting the public and national debt. Because everybody on the public is,
bankrupt. They put HJR 192 in title 31
section 5118 2D. “No contract shall
contain an obligation which purports to give the obligee the right to demand
payment in any kind of specific coin or currency of the United States. They outlawed money. They did this under the
War Powers Act.
How can there be a debt when there is no money.
June 4, 1933 they codified HJR 190 in title 31, sec 5118.
(Banking Code) under the War Powers
Act. There was no legal authority for
doing this. Franklin Roosevelt sold more gold contracts than there was gold.
They were going to run on the Treasury so he had to put a stop to it. And he
declared a national emergency thru the Emergency Bank Act of arch 9, 1933. It’s
in the Congressional Record- I am not making this up. In 1970, they took 3 billion dollars out of
Social Security to cover the British Treasury Department – they were going
broke because all these corporations under GAT was converting all their dollars
to euros, and they made a run on the British Treasury, and they didn’t have any
currency, so they stole 3 billion dollars out of Social Security. They did this
in 1970 under the Marshal Plan. One congressman was investigating it and they
murdered him. This officially outlawed money (CFR31-5118). When you sign a promissory note, it says you
will pay back in US dollars. That’s why they indorse it on the back – to make
it legal – it then is no longer a promissory note, it is an order to pay. When you sign a mortgage, it is a financial
agreement conveying your property to them – it is fraud, void. Then they sell
it on the open market.
They track these with a CUSIP (committee on uniform security
identification process) number. (9-digit number – the first 6 digits identifies
what security it is. This is how they track you – that and trough your
AUTOTRIS).
CUSIP is located on Water Street in DC in the DTC building. They have another called ISIP (international
securities identification process) in the ISID International Securities
Identification directory."
************************************
So you're still the rightful OWNER of your sovereignty that
you 'deposited' with the State, but CAN'T USE IT, just like you can't use the
money that you deposited with a bank in return for Certificates of Deposit. And
in order to get back your sovereign status, you'd have to basically return to
them the Birth Certificate, maybe with an affidavit stating that it's the only
BC that you have, and tell them that you cancel their trusteeship which was
created by the original application for the BC.
And of course when you return the only copy of the BC that
you have, you no longer can access gov't benefits. And if you are no longer
eligible for gov't benefits, then the trust no longer exists, because without
gov't benefits, the State did NOT give any value, so it has no rights/authority
over you.
That's UCC for you; unless one gives VALUE, security
interest does NOT attach. And without security interest, the State has NO
RIGHTS/authority against you, because it has no equitable title to your
property, as you're in the PRIVATE.
BIGGEST SCAM OF ALL TIME COURT HOUSES ARE BOND TRADING HOUSES
COURT HOUSES ARE MONEY TRADING COMPANIES
JUDGES INVEST THEIR PENSIONS IN CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Whereas “The people are sovereign and not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,…..It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound.” People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825). and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the King ceded his sovereignty to the American people, so they became sovereigns without subjects, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that "The right of expatriation is a natural, inherent, and inalienable right and extends to the Indian as well as to the white race. "United States, ex rel. Standing Bear, v. George Crook. 25 F.Cas. 695 (1879), and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
JUDGES INVEST THEIR PENSIONS IN CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
When recorded send to:
Henry: Frederick of the Kroll
family
513 Peninsula Avenue
Kenai, Alaska [99611-9998]
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
ONLY
===========================================================================
NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT AND
BILL IN EQUITY
Whereas it is my
understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has
been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding a society (STATE) is defined as a number of people joined by
mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that the State of Alaska does business as a corporation with an
IRS EIN number 92-6001185 and the transactions are not always in the best
interest of the people, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that the State of Alaska sells the people’s resources for
billions of dollars and the transactions are not always in the best interest of
the people for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Alaska is a
representative one, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor
governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by
the Constitution Act, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and
employees of government, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding those who have a Social Security Number are in fact employees of
the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the
federal government, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that it is lawful to abandon one & rsquo;s Social Security
Number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding
people in Alaska have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and
thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of
government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land
has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions,
obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that when
your parents sign up for it, you get a Birth Certificate, which gives you
certain RIGHTS to gov't benefits. And that's in return for you depositing your
SOVEREIGNTY with the federal gov't. You see, American people are sovereign, and
as such they're not liable for the national debt or income taxes, and the gov't
needs someone to back up their fiat 'money' scheme and spending, without them
being responsible for it so they have created this criminal scheme, and,
Whereas I, Henry-Frederick of
the Kroll family was born a free man and child of God on a vessel floating on
navigable waters near the town of Seldovia before Alaska was a state, and,
My mother, the Public Health
Nurse, signed my certificate of live birth as the attending physician, and,
Whereas
sometime after statehood the State of Alaska illegally absorbed my STANDARD
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH and crossed out the original Register Number 21701
and put a blue boarder around it with a state seal and a state bond number
121462, and,
Whereas
the STATE OF ALASKA CORPORATION monetized me without my consent or knowledge
and sold my fraudulent birth bond to investors, and,
Whereas I, Henry-Frederick of
the Kroll family claim to be a Freeman-on-the-Land and not a corporate bonded
slave sold into bondage by criminals, and,
Whereas "When your parents signed the birth
certificate, they created a legal fiction called a straw man. In commercial law it’s called a (homus
straus?), which is a legal fiction or straw man. First the State registered it
with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept.
of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC (Depository Trust Company). This
company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and settlement company. The
DTC is nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE and company. That’s the nominee,
and,
Whereas all your money goes through this
company (DTC). This is the clearing corporation, clearing house and settlement
depository for all commodities and securities. All commodities and securities
are registered with CEDE and Co. under rule 12. Everybody is reading the
UCC. You should be reading SEC. Alpine
publishing in NYC they have the national securities and exchange act of
1934. There are two of them one in 1933,
and one in 1934 - two different acts.
You should be studying these rules because what they're doing under rule
12 they are register your birth certificate. – Under rule 12 as a
security. They register this in the name
of CEDE and Co. There are two types of securities Certificated and
un-certificated. What they do is issue a
certificate. Isn’t that what it says on your birth (certificate of live birth)?
When they register it they issue a certificate, it becomes a certificated
security. And it’s registered in the name of CEDE and Co. What does that make them? It makes them the registered holder. This has
nothing to do with debtor/creditor law.
Whereas you own everything and you don’t
control anything. They control
everything why? Because they are the registered owner– of the certificated
security (birth certificate) and they use this as collateral. You have to know
what is going on before you go in there a start filing these UCC’s.
Whereas it is my
understanding that acting peacefully within community standards and claiming my
rights as a free man does not breach the peace, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license
must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a
Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do
not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities,
especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas without security interest, the State
has NO RIGHTS/authority against you, because it has no equitable title to your
property, as you're in the PRIVATE, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that it is impossible to prove jurisdiction exists absent a
substantial nexus with the state, such as voluntary subscription to
license, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that all jurisdictional facts supporting claim that
supposed jurisdiction exists must appear on the record of the court.”
Pipe Line v. Marathon. 102 S. Ct. 3858 quoting Crowell v Benson 883 US 22.Whereas it is my understanding that “People of a state are entitled to all rights, which formerly belong to
the King by his prerogative.” Lansing v Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9,20 (NY).
Whereas it is my understanding that "The
state can only tax and regulate something it creates". Ward v.
Maryland 12 Wallace 418, and it did not create me, and,Whereas “The people are sovereign and not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign,…..It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound.” People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825). and,
Whereas it is my understanding that the King ceded his sovereignty to the American people, so they became sovereigns without subjects, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that "The right of expatriation is a natural, inherent, and inalienable right and extends to the Indian as well as to the white race. "United States, ex rel. Standing Bear, v. George Crook. 25 F.Cas. 695 (1879), and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to
claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over
those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a
fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas the STATE OF ALASKA
is a corporation operating under the DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION taxpayer’s
identification number: 92-6001185, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that the court: SUPERIOR COURT ‘FOR’ THE STATE OF ALASKA is a
contract court working ‘FOR’ the STATE OF ALASKA under the Department of
Administration, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that Alaska court houses are bond
trading companies contracted to take money from the birth bonds of ‘PERSONS’
by the use of ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTS created by printing the PERSON’S name in
all capital letters to enrich the State Treasury, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that judges invest their pension funds into Corrections
Corporation of America, and,
Whereas it is my understanding
the reason my case number 3AN-04-9O8O-CI
was allowed to continue more than eleven years was for the purpose of taking
millions of dollars from my birth bond number: 1214625 that was put upon my
birth certificate by state bureaucrats without my consent or knowledge sometime
after statehood, and,
Whereas
the State of Alaska allowed the dumping of radioactive drill tailing from 200
oil wells between 1060 and the year 2000, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that departments within the State of Alaska allowed two
oil tankers a day for more than twenty years to dump billions of gallons of
tanker ballast water taken from Los Angeles, Anacortes, Hawaii, Korea, and
Japanese boat harbors into Cook Inlet and Kodiak waters, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that the ballast water contained trillions of foreign
bacteria, algae and nematodes not native to Alaska that altered the plankton
blooms making it impossible for the shrimp and crab to survive thereby taking
over a billion dollars a year away from the private sector, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that there were eight oil well blowouts in Cook Inlet,
and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that offshore drilling rigs have pipes that eject toxic
pollutants deep under water where the sheen doesn’t show on the surface, and,
Whereas
commercial crab fishermen like myself lost a billion dollars’ worth of boats and
gear after the crab and shrimp resource were destroyed, and,
Whereas
after the crab and shrimp resources were destroyed many small town processing
plants went bankrupt and thousands of cannery workers lost their jobs, and,
Whereas
the cities of Homer, Kodiak, Old Harbor and other towns lost their
infrastructure and had to depend more on state and federal grants to provide
services to their people, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that DNR allow this to happen to eliminate the inshore
fishing fleet so that they could sell billions of dollars of oil leases in lower
Cook Inlet down Shelikoff Strait, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that as it turned out there is little or no oil in the
area, and,
Whereas it is my understanding
that all processes in the cited CASE NO: 3KN-11-00695CI, have been summary
processed in which the Constitutional and commercial right to jury trial has
been abridged and denied and all other supporting processes have likewise been
summary processed, and,
Whereas I was informed by the
alleged judge of the alleged court that I could appeal if I did not like his
decision, and given that I am age 71 the alleged judge has a sadistic sense of
humor, and,
Whereas I read the conclusion
of twenty of the recent Supreme Court cases and not one of them reversed the
decision of the Superior Court, and,
Whereas my chances of
prevailing in on appeal are less than 5%, the reason being that the Court Clerk
would have to return the money taken from the bounds and given to the state,
and,
Whereas
it is my understating that this entire case constitutes multiple fraud
violations including the failure to acknowledge the July 26th 2014 BLM
survey as proof that there is no case, and,
Whereas
is it my understanding that the BAR association is a foreign corporation based
in England, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that ‘BAR’ stands for British Accredited Registry, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that all officers of the court sworn to uphold BAR rules
and are acting as foreign agents on American soil, and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that BAR members are foreign agents committing TREASON
on American soil and the penalty for treason is death, and,
Whereas
thousands of counts of fraud have been perpetrated against the people of Alaska
depriving them of life, liberty and property worth many billions of dollars,
and,
Whereas
it is my understanding that administrative rulings by fraudulent contract
courts are totally lacking in validity and jurisdiction having no effect
whatever on sovereign citizens, and
Whereas
common law is still in effect in America and USE of Federal Reserve Notes to make purchases, CREATES tax liability,
while the SSN officially makes you a taxpayer and provides the gov't with an
easy mechanism for collecting that tax. Which is why a DEMAND for lawful money
is a MAJOR step out of the corporate Matrix, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding the United States of America,{the land of the free}has more
people in jail that Russia and China combined, and,
Whereas a Harvard-UC Berkley
study found that the chance of a child escaping the poorest of Americans and
land among its richest had increased only 0.6 percent in 15 years while Denmark
has twice the chance of an American to escape poverty, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for
the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that the property that I inhabited for 70 years and used it before
Alaska was a state and that I have the right of use and access free of charge
and,
Whereas I claim the right to
collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not
affected if I abandon my
Social Insurance Number, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding that a summons is merely an invitation and summons issued by defacto
contract courts working for the corporate government create no obligation or
dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my
understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law
and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in
fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to
refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me
breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by
acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges
against a Freeman-on-the-Land in a de-facto contract court, and,
Furthermore, I claim that
these actions are not outside my communities ’ standards and will in
fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the
right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me
is held under a claim of right, and,
Furthermore, I claim the
right to deed my property to others as I see fit, and,
Furthermore, I claim that
anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice
of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is
breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such
transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure and not
a contract court working for the State of Alaska, and,
Furthermore, I claim that the
courts in Alaska are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in
fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the
transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent
of both parties prior to providing any such services.
Furthermore, I claim all
transactions of security interests require the consent of both
parties and I do hereby deny
consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as
herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act, and,
Furthermore, I claim my FEE
SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or
agents or justice system participants is FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or
portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed
or otherwise
regulated and FOUR THOUSAND
DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported,
incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express
written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the
right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE
SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or
my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the
right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially
criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or
justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to
dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or
omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights
and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law
of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the
right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum
using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion
and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to
dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond
appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action.
Reponses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and
penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later
than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of
certificate of service. Whereas if this claim is not responded to in the stated
fashion and time it shall remain in force forever, and,
Whereas
I hereby present a bill: §1205. Bill in equity by injured person to the
State of Alaska.
"1. Injunctive relief; damages and
costs. Any person damaged or who is threatened with loss or injury by
reason of a violation or threatened violation of this chapter may bring a civil
action in the Superior Court in the county where he resides, to prevent,
restrain or enjoin such violation or threatened violation. If in such action a
violation or threatened violation of this chapter shall be established, the
court may enjoin and restrain or otherwise prohibit such violation or
threatened violation. In such action it shall not be necessary that actual
damages to the plaintiff be alleged or proved. In addition to such injunctive
relief, the plaintiff in said action shall be entitled to recover from the
defendant 3 times the amount of actual damages by him sustained and the costs
of the action including reasonable attorneys' fees."
Whereas 2.
Equity SUPERSEDES codes if you have a valid claim. So if you pay with green
paper you are NOT entitled to Equity. However
when I bought the Kroll homestead land from Del and Nancy Alsop, I paid them
40-one-ounce gold krugerrands when gold was worth $990 and ounce. I mentioned this fact earlier in my un-rebutted
affidavits.” I paid Dell Alsop REAL gold and I AM entitled to make a claim in
Equity. And,
Whereas
I also make a PROPERTY CLAIM. CLAIM:
A claim is a challenge of the ownership of a thing which a man has not in
possession, and is wrongfully withheld by another. Plowd. 359; Wee i Dall.444;
12 S. & R. 179. __ 1856 Bouvier's
Law Dictionary. Whereas
until 1933 we had REAL gold and silver money and
REAL common law, which was divided into AT LAW (criminal) and EQUITY (civil)
jurisdictions. But since in 1933 the United States went bankrupt, took all the
people’s gold and replaced real money with green paper, people no longer have
REAL ownership, and all property ownership is presumed to be in the State,
because you CAN'T acquire FULL ownership rights, when you pay for things with
PAPER notes.
Whereas the ownership of property is split into
the EQUITABLE title which belongs to the State, and the LEGAL title which YOU
get. And the equitable title gives the State the right to REGULATE 'your'
property, while the legal title gives you the right to POSSESS and USE that
property, subject to State regulation, and,
Whereas if we still had REAL gold money in
circulation, people would get a FULL, LAWFUL title to their property, which
would NOT be subject to State regulation, except
when used in commerce, like for example using a boat or auto for BUSINESS purposes,
and,
Whereas
after 1933 people no longer had FULL property rights, the At Law and Equity
jurisdictions were replaced by a STATUTORY jurisdiction, since in absence of
real money and lawful titles, everyone's subject to State codes and statutes.
In other words, ONLY people with FULL property rights are entitled to make a
CLAIM under Equity, while everyone else is subject to codes and statutes.
However since we the people are forced
to us the fiat paper currency we can
claim Equity, and,
Whereas the people of this nation were turned
into bonded slaves to back the fiat currency by the bond numbers put on their
birth certificates at birth, and,
Whereas when people are killed during a
military conflict the generals and the press refer to them as collateral
damage, and,
Whereas what is SPECIAL about Equity, is that it
SUPERSEDES codes and statutes. If you pay with REAL gold or silver or with
your labor then you WOULD be entitled to make a claim in Equity, and,
Whereas Equity is for anyone who was
damaged, is threatened to be damaged, or has a CLAIM which means
that it also could be used as a COUNTER-CLAIM, against anyone trying to
restrict use of your property (which you bought with lawful money) such as a
car, or when that car was impounded. In
this case we use the land and items taken in COMMERCE!
Whereas
the only duty of any Government is to secure and protect property. Please restore my property.
“Truth Has No Agenda!”
Whereas the land is question is shown as tideland on all State and Federal plats,
and,
Whereas
Ninilchik Natives Association can’t claim tideland. In fact they had to
lease tideland from the State of Alaska DNR 3/4 of a mile west of the sand spit
to construct a temporary dock to export wood chips, and,
Whereas the present owners of the homestead
cannot claim the sand spit because it is tideland lying outside the boundaries
of United States Survey 4684.
Whereas I have many decades of sweat equity
building cabins and the boats we use in our set-net fishery. I have sweat
equity in constructing our 3,600 square foot home plus the hanging and mending
our fish nets, boats and gear.
Whereas I am a sovereign “ON” the land
USING IT IN COMMERCE with a valid claim to it before Alaska was a state.
The cited Lien Debtors will be
lined for a minimum of $22,857,000.00 each, based on Title 18,
Section 241, of the United States Code for violation of United States
Constitutional Rights including the Seventh Amendment of the Bill of Rights,
guaranteeing a jury trial in all commercial processes and approximately 35
other commercial provisions of the United States Constitution.
- BILL IN EQUITY –
Pertaining
to the Public Fraud, Law, Money and Commercial Liens:
To
Whom These Presents Shall Come; Greetings; Take Notice: I HEREBY DEMAND
COMPENSATION FOR THE FOLLOWING LOSSES INCURRED DUE TO CORRPUTION FRAUD AND
MISMANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC RESOURCES AND THE LOSSES INCURRED DUE TO THE FRIVOLOUUS
LAWSUIT: NO. 3AN-04-9080
CIVIL. Claimants are allowed to claim four times their actual losses.
1.
My Attorney costs for this frivolous lawsuit: $
135,980.
2.
The destruction of the crab fishery with tanker
ballast water: $2,000,000.
3.
My brother’s life: No amount of money can repay
me for that.
4.
My Daughter’s life: No amount of money can repay
me for that.
5.
The cost of my bankruptcy due to the destruction
of the crab fisheries: $900,000.
6.
Loss of my 72-foot boat, Mary M after the state
allowed the destruction of the shrimp and crab fisheries: today’s boat prices:
$1,950,000.
7.
Loss of 200 crab pots: $ 150,000.
8.
Loss of our home, warehouse and deep water
mooring in Halibut Cove $600,000.
9.
Loss of Tuxedni Bay homestead after I paid off
the State mortgage $1,000,000.
10. Loss
of the herring fishery due to oil spills. $2,000,000.
11. Loss
of my process ship Orion: $6,950,000 after a state company stole my business
plan.
12. Loss
of the halibut fishery given away to the Federal Corporation by Governor, Tony
Knowles for political gain: $1,000,000.
13. Loss
of the shrimp & clams due to tanker ballast & oil well blowouts:
$100,000.
14. Health
related problems due to divorce, suffering, worry and stress: $334,020.
15. Loss
due declining value and forced sale of our Seldovia property. $150,000.
(EXHIBIT 13 B.)
16. Lost
fishing time for having to appear in court: $20,000.
17. Our skiffs and outboards are worth $30,000.
18. Twelve nets are worth a total of $10,600.00
with anchors buoys and lines.
19. I paid $10,000 for my Polaris six wheeler
in Tuxedni Bay.
20. The 20 by 20-foot cabin on the Home point
$20,000.
21. 10 by 12-foot cabin 100 yards west of home
$8,000.
22. 8 by 8-foot cabin on the end of the sand
spit $4,000.
23. 8 by 8-foot sauna cabin $4,000.
24. 8 BY 8-foot heavy timber, cellar with
cement foundation $4,000.
25. 8 by 8-foot generator shed $2,000.
26. Machine shop tools including my 16-inch
swing metal lathe plus all the accessory tools, welder, planer, table saw etc.
$20,000.
27. Loss of my 13 by 24-foot upstairs apartment
$ 8,000.
28. Our annual salmon catch of $50,000.00 for
the next ten years $500,000.
29. The loss of our future subsistence hunting
and fishing rights. $500,000.
30. Lost time, stress and aggravation over the
last eleven years $110,000.
31. The money taken out of HENRY KROLL
CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080
CIVIL during the last eleven years. $4,000,000.
Total owed AFFIANT: $22,857,000.00 jointly and
severally. Please be advised that the lien claimant of a non-judicial
commercial lien is entitled to three times the actual loss. A commercial lien
will be recorded and UCC1 within 20 days.
Whereas it is mandated in The
Constitution of the State of Alaska SECTION 18. EMINENT DOMAIN: Private
property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just
compensation. If the SUPERIOR COURT cannot abide with the Alaska Constitution
in Case No. 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL then
it is not a COURT.
Whereas the
lawsuit was a violation of our families’ First Amendment Animist religious
beliefs. As a Native Alaskans born in Alaska we have to work with nature and
become a part of it to survive. Destroying our means to earn a living, taking
our fishing gear, private property and forcing us to live in poverty without
just compensation is genocide.
Whereas Defendants were made to suffer
numerous TORTS forcing us to attending unlawful administrative hearings, use
credit cards to pay lawyers and other TORTS described in my 15 un-rebutted
AFFIDAVITS filed with this court in alleged CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080
CIVIL to defend our subsistence hunting and fishing rights, our right to earn a
living and our way of life. The only duty of any government is to secure and
protect property, and,
Whereas Officers of the Court dis not uphold their oaths they
are in Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Please restore my property.
Failure to register a dispute
against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and
permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of
charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land.
Place of claim of right to
use: sand spit / tideland south of US 4685 north shore Tuxedni Bay, Alaska
North American Union ~ One World Order.
Furthermore I claim the right
to file and enforce a COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST those parties
who stole property from me
and my family under color of law using CONSTUCTIVE TRUST administrative rulings
in a contract court. Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and
affected parties, that I, _______________________________________ a Freeman-on
the- Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to
peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions
and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Constructive Notice of Child
of God Status:
Whereas Alaska is a territory
claimed and founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God
and the rule of law, and,
Whereas the number two
position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and,
Whereas the governments of
this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and,
Whereas I am desirous of
living my life as a 'Child of God,' and,
Whereas the only powers able
to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and,
Whereas neither the
government, nor its agents nor its representatives or employees are God, or
above God, and,
Whereas by legally claiming
the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position
above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,
Be it known to any and all,
that on this date,
_________________________________I,________________________________________a
free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'.
Any human being who wishes to
claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are
God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of
which can be found the verifiable signature of God. Failure to first do one of
the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is
unlawful. Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling
one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and /or
extortion.
Defendants were made to suffer TORTS forcing us
to attending unlawful administrative hearings, use credit cards to pay lawyers
and other TORTS described in my 15 un-rebutted AFFIDAVITS filed with this court
in alleged CASE NUMBER 3AN-04-9080 CIVIL to defend our subsistence hunting
and fishing rights, our right to earn a living and our way of life. The only
duty of any government is to secure and protect property. If Officers of the Court don’t uphold their oaths they are in
Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Please
restore my property.
I, Henry-Frederick: Kroll,
hereby verify that this AFFIDAVIT NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT AND CLAIM
OF RIGHT is true and correct, according to the best
of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God. A real court of LAW
must proceed under Oath of Office and in truth.
Notice to Principal is
Notice to agent and Notice to agent is Notice to Principal.
Dated
this____day of FEBRUARY 2015
Respectfully
signed:
Sui Juris
By authorized representative, HENRY KROLL
Without
prejudice, UCC 1-207 & UCC 1-308
Jurat
Subscribed
and sworn to at____________, before me this___day of February, 2015
Notary
Public_____________________________
My
Commission Expires____________________
My hand and official
seal_____________________
CERTIFICATE
OF MAILING
I,
Henry Kroll do hereby swear and declare that I have served by the United States
Mail, a copy of this NOTICE OF
UUDERSTANDING INTENT AND CLAIM OF RIGHT BILL
IN EQUITY by US mail to the respondents listed below.
Dated February____, 2015
By authorized representative, Henry-Frederick for
HENRY KROLL
Alaska Superior Court Andrew
R. Naylor
825 West 4th Avenue 1031 W. 4th Ave, Ste. 200
Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Anchorage,
Alaska 99501
BRIAN DUFFY Ninilchik Native Association Inc. Calvin
Jones
1029 W. 3rd Ave., Ste. 510 PO
Box 241921
Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 258-9053 Anchorage, Alaska
99524
Marla Greenstein Jeremy
Provencio and Caroline Kroll
510 L Street, Suite 585 PO Box 222211
Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Anchorage,
Alaska 99501
Adam Smith Senator Don
Young
State of Alaska DNR Governor Bill Walker
550 W. 5th Ave., Suite 900 C Mark Begich
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3577 Senator
Dan Sullivan
State of Alaska Department of
Administration
P.O. Box 110204
Juneau, Alaska 99811-0204
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)